Pacific CRYSTAL Project: Explicit Literacy Instruction Embedded in Middle School Science Classrooms

Science literacy leading to fuller and informed participation in the public debate about science, technology, society, and environmental (STSE) issues that produce justified decisions and sustainable actions is the shared and central goal of the Pacific CRYSTAL Project. There is broad agreement by science education researchers that learners need to be able to construct and interpret specific scientific discourses and texts to be literate in science. We view these capabilities as components in the fundamental sense of science literacy and as interactive and synergetic to the derived sense of science literacy, which refers to having general knowledge about concepts, principles, and methods of science. This article reports on preliminary findings from Years 1, 2, and 3 of the 5-year Pacific CRYSTAL project that aims to identify, develop, and embed explicit literacy instruction in science programs to achieve both senses of science literacy. A community-based, opportunistic, engineering research and development approach has been utilized to identify problems and concerns and to design instructional solutions for teaching middle school (Grades 6, 7, and 8) science. Initial data indicate (a) opportunities in programs for embedding literacy instruction and tasks; (b) difficulties generalist teachers have with new science curricula; (c) difficulties specialist science teachers have with literacy activities, strategies, genre, and writing-to-learn science tasks; and (d) potential literacy activities (vocabulary, reading comprehension, visual literacy, genre, and writing tasks) for middle school science. Preinstruction student assessments indicate a range of challenges in achieving effective learning in science and the need for extensive teacher support to achieve the project’s goals. Postinstructional assessments indicate positive changes in students’ ability to perform target reading and writing tasks. Qualitative data indicate teachers’ desire for external direction and the need for researchers to expand the literacy framework to include oral discourse. A case study of teachers’ use of a specific literacy task and its influence on students revealed indications of robustness and effectiveness. Experiences revealed procedural difficulties and insights regarding community-based research and development approaches.

[1]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students' metacognition and comprehension of specific science text , 1999 .

[2]  J. Shymansky,et al.  Sensing the Impact of Elementary School Science Reform: A Study of Stakeholder Perceptions of Implementation, Constructivist Strategies, and School–Home Collaboration , 2005 .

[3]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Writing as a Learning Tool: Integrating Theory and Practice. Studies in Writing, Volume 7. , 2001 .

[4]  L. Yore,et al.  Reflections on Beyond the Gold Standards Era and Ways of Promoting Compelling Arguments about Science Literacy for All , 2009 .

[5]  M. Chiu,et al.  Research Ethics Boards and the Gold Standard(s) in Literacy and Science Education Research , 2009 .

[6]  J. Shymansky,et al.  Empowering Families in Hands‐on Science Programs , 2000 .

[7]  Carole Ford Reforms, Visions, and Standards: A Cross-Curricular View from an Elementary School Perspective. , 1997 .

[8]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Learning From Text Designed to Model Scientific Thinking in Inquiry-Based Instruction , 2004 .

[9]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[10]  Michael P. Klentschy,et al.  Helping English Learners Increase Achievement Through Inquiry-Based Science Instruction , 2002 .

[11]  Russell N. Carney,et al.  Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning from Text , 2002 .

[12]  Rowena Douglas,et al.  Linking Science and Literacy in the K-8 Classroom. , 2006 .

[13]  Iris R. Weiss,et al.  Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation's local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative , 2007 .

[14]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[15]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Writing for Learning in Science: A Secondary Analysis of Six Studies , 2007 .

[16]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Visualization : theory and practice in science education , 2008 .

[17]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  The National Science Education Standards. , 2000 .

[18]  Nancy R. Romance,et al.  A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four , 1992 .

[19]  E. Wendy Saul,et al.  Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[20]  L. Yore,et al.  Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research , 2003 .

[21]  Michael P. Klentschy,et al.  Students' Science Notebooks and the Inquiry Process , 2004 .

[22]  The Impact of a State Systemic Initiative on U.S. Science Teachers and Students , 2003 .

[23]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .

[24]  Nahum S. Kipnis Chance in Science: The Discovery of Electromagnetism by H.C. Oersted , 2005 .

[25]  A. Palincsar,et al.  Where Literacy and Science Intersect. , 2007 .

[26]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[27]  Brian Hand,et al.  Examining the Impact of Student Use of Multiple Modal Representations in Constructing Arguments in Organic Chemistry Laboratory Classes , 2010 .

[28]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The Educational Value of Multiple-representations when Learning Complex Scientific Concepts , 2008 .

[29]  Diane M. Griffiths,et al.  THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA , 2007 .

[30]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Written Discourse in Scientific Communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language , 2006 .

[31]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students , 2004 .

[32]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Quality research in literacy and science education : international perspectives and gold standards , 2009 .

[33]  D. Pimm,et al.  The Literacy Component of Mathematical and Scientific Literacy , 2007 .

[34]  Madge T. Craig,et al.  Index of Science Reading Awareness: An Interactive-Constructive Model, Test Verification, and Grades 4-8 Results. , 1998 .

[35]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Current Realities and Future Possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction , 2006 .

[36]  Michael P. Klentschy Designing Professional Development Opportunities for Teachers that Foster Collaboration, Capacity Building and Reflective Practice. , 2005 .

[37]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Sequential Writing Tasks’ Influence on Science Learning , 2001 .

[38]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises , 1994 .