The profitability of moving average trading rules in South Asian stock markets

Abstract Two studies published in the last decade ( Brock et al., 1992 , Hudson et al., 1996 ) uncover evidence that technical trading rules have predictive ability with respect to market indices in the USA and the UK. This study analyses the performance of one group of these trading rules using index data for four emerging South Asian capital markets (the Bombay Stock Exchange, the Colombo Stock Exchange, the Dhaka Stock Exchange and the Karachi Stock Exchange) and examines the implications of the results for the weak form of the efficient market hypothesis. The findings indicate that technical trading rules have predictive ability in these markets and reject the null hypothesis that the returns to be earned from studying moving average values are equal to those achieved from a naive buy and hold strategy; the employment of these techniques generates excess returns to investors in South Asian markets.

[1]  F. Reilly,et al.  Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management , 1979 .

[2]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Some New Filter Rule Tests: Methods and Results , 1988, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[3]  C. Akemann,et al.  Relative Strength does Persist! , 1977 .

[4]  Robert A. Levy,et al.  Random Walks: Reality or Myth , 1967 .

[5]  James M. Steeley,et al.  The Impact of Portfolio Diversification on Trading Rules Profits: Some Evidence for UK Share Portfolios , 1997 .

[6]  E. Fama,et al.  Filter Rules and Stock-Market Trading , 1966 .

[7]  Robert A. Levy,et al.  RELATIVE STRENGTH AS A CRITERION FOR INVESTMENT SELECTION , 1967 .

[8]  James F. Bohan Relative strength , 1981 .

[9]  Robert Hudson,et al.  A note on the weak form efficiency of capital markets: The application of simple technical trading rules to UK stock prices - 1935 to 1994 , 1996 .

[10]  C. Inclan,et al.  Volatility in Emerging Stock Markets , 1997, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[11]  F. E. James Monthly Moving Averages—An Effective Investment Tool? , 1968, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[12]  J. V. Horne,et al.  The Random-Walk Theory: An Empirical Test , 1967 .

[13]  E. Fama EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK* , 1970 .

[14]  Filter Rule Tests Of The Economic Significance Of Serial Dependencies In Daily Stock Returns , 1992 .

[15]  Keith E. Boles,et al.  The Predictive Power in Relative Strength & CAPM , 1983 .

[16]  B. LeBaron,et al.  Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns , 1992 .

[17]  Bruce I. Jacobs, Ph.D.,et al.  Disentangling Equity Return Regularities: New Insights and Investment Opportunities , 1987 .

[18]  Michael C. Jensen,et al.  Random Walks and Technical Theories: Some Additional Evidence , 1970 .