Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations

Abstract In an example of the redundancy effect, learning is inhibited when written and spoken text containing the same information is presented simultaneously rather than in written or spoken form alone. The current research was designed to investigate whether the redundancy effect applied to reading comprehension in English as a foreign language (EFL) by comparing two instructional formats, written presentation only and written presentation concurrent with verbatim spoken presentation. Participants were in their first year of tertiary education. Examination of translation scores, subjective mental load ratings, and free recall performance indicated that simultaneous presentations rendered text comprehension less effective both at a lexical level and at the level of text comprehension compared with written presentation only.

[1]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  Paul Chandler,et al.  When Redundant On-Screen Text in Multimedia Technical Instruction Can Interfere With Learning , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Isabel Borrás,et al.  Effects of Multimedia Courseware Subtitling on the Speaking Performance of College Students of French , 1994 .

[4]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Models of Understanding Text , 1996 .

[5]  Akiyo Hirai,et al.  The Relationship between Listening and Reading Rates of Japanese EFL Learners , 1999 .

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[7]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[8]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[9]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[10]  B. Meyer.  The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[11]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[12]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[13]  E. Geva,et al.  Linguistic and Cognitive Correlates of Academic Skills in First and Second Languages , 1993 .

[14]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  G. Kasper,et al.  The Role of Comprehension in Second-language Learning , 1986 .

[16]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  When two sensory modes are better than one , 1997 .

[17]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[18]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[19]  Paul Markham,et al.  Captioned Videotapes and Second‐Language Listening Word Recognition , 1999 .

[20]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[21]  Brenda Oded,et al.  Deeper processing for better EFL reading comprehension , 2001 .

[22]  Barbara C. Schmidt-Rinehart.  The Effects of Topic Familiarity on Second Language Listening Comprehension , 1994 .

[23]  J. Sweller,et al.  Natural Information Processing Systems , 2006 .

[24]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction. , 2000 .

[26]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening , 2002 .

[28]  M. Call,et al.  Auditory Short-Term Memory, Listening Comprehension, and the Input Hypothesis , 1985 .

[29]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading: Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading , 1988 .

[30]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[31]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[32]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Extending capacity-constrained construction integration: Toward "smarter" and flexible models of text comprehension , 1996 .

[33]  C. Penney.  Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[34]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[35]  Wynne Wong.  MODALITY AND ATTENTION TO MEANING AND FORM IN THE INPUT , 2001, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[36]  J. Sweller.  Evolution of human cognitive architecture , 2003 .

[37]  Patricia Dunkel,et al.  The Effect of Speech Modification, Prior Knowledge, and Listening Proficiency on EFL Lecture Learning , 1992 .

[38]  Thomas J. Garza,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Captioned Video Materials in Advanced Foreign Language Learning , 1991 .

[39]  R. J. Lund.  A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. , 1991 .

[40]  Penny Ur,et al.  Teaching Listening Comprehension , 1984 .

[41]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[42]  J. Sweller.  Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[43]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[44]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading , 1988 .

[45]  R. Lado.  MEMORY SPAN AS A FACTOR IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING , 1965 .

[46]  Jane E. Berne.  How Does Varying Pre-listening Activities Affect Second Language Listening Comprehension?. , 1995 .

[47]  Patricia S. Koskinen,et al.  Captioned Television as Comprehensible Input: Effects of Incidental Word Learning from Context for Language Minority Students. , 1992 .

[48]  Mark Sawyer,et al.  L2 Working Memory Capacity and L2 Reading Skill , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[49]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[50]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[51]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory and Language , 2018, Working Memories.

[52]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory and instructional design , 1997 .

[53]  Davies Alan,et al.  Peter Strevens 1992-1989 , 1990 .

[54]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[56]  B. R. Gomulicki.  Recall as an abstractive process , 1956 .

[57]  John Sweller,et al.  Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load , 2005 .