A new semi-parametric method for autocorrelated age- and time-varying selectivity in age-structured assessment models

Selectivity is a key parameter in stock assessments that describes how fisheries interact with different ages and sizes of fish. It is usually confounded with other processes (e.g., natural mortality and recruitment) in stock assessments and the assumption of selectivity can strongly affect stock assessment outcome. Here, we introduce a new semi-parametric selectivity method, which we implement and test in Stock Synthesis. This selectivity method includes a parametric component and an autocorrelated nonparametric component consisting of deviations from the parametric component. We explore the new selectivity method using two simulation experiments, which show that the two autocorrelation parameters for selectivity deviations of data-rich fisheries are estimable using either mixed-effect or simpler sample-based algorithms. When selectivity deviations of a data-rich fishery are highly autocorrelated, using the new method to estimate the two autocorrelation parameters leads to more precise estimations of spawning biomass and fully selected fishing mortality. However, this new method fails to improve model performance in low data quality cases where measurement error in the data overwhelms the pattern caused by the autocorrelated process. Finally, we use a case study involving North Sea herring (Clupea harengus) to show that our new method substantially reduces autocorrelations in the Pearson residuals in fit to age composition data.

[1]  Ian J. Stewart,et al.  Towards defining good practices for modeling time-varying selectivity , 2014 .

[2]  R. Francis,et al.  Replacing the multinomial in stock assessment models: A first step , 2014 .

[3]  James N. Ianelli,et al.  Bayesian stock assessment using catch-age data and the sampling - importance resampling algorithm , 1997 .

[4]  André E. Punt,et al.  Model selection for selectivity in fisheries stock assessments , 2014 .

[5]  R.I.C. Chris Francis.  Revisiting data weighting in fisheries stock assessment models , 2017 .

[6]  Kevin R. Piner,et al.  Dealing with data conflicts in statistical inference of population assessment models that integrate information from multiple diverse data sets , 2017 .

[7]  V. Bartolino,et al.  Herring Assessment Working Group for the Area South of 62° N (HAWG) , 2020 .

[8]  Cole C. Monnahan,et al.  Implications of process error in selectivity for approaches to weighting compositional data in fisheries stock assessments , 2017 .

[9]  J. Thorson,et al.  Spatial semiparametric models improve estimates of species abundance and distribution , 2014 .

[10]  Rhoda Weiss,et al.  A new role. , 2013, Marketing health services.

[11]  FrancisR.I.C. Chris,et al.  Data weighting in statistical fisheries stock assessment models , 2011 .

[12]  James T. Thorson,et al.  Catch curve stock-reduction analysis: An alternative solution to the catch equations , 2015 .

[13]  Ian G. Taylor,et al.  A comparison of parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric approaches to selectivity in age-structured assessment models , 2014 .

[14]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Model-based estimates of effective sample size in stock assessment models using the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution , 2017 .

[15]  John Sibert,et al.  AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[16]  Mark N. Maunder,et al.  Review and evaluation of likelihood functions for composition data in stock-assessment models: Estimating the effective sample size , 2011 .

[17]  Mark N. Maunder,et al.  Selectivity : theory , estimation , and application in fishery stock assessment models Workshop Series Report 1 June 2013 , 2013 .

[18]  K. F. Johnson,et al.  Can autocorrelated recruitment be estimated using integrated assessment models and how does it affect population forecasts , 2016 .

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  Anders Nielsen,et al.  TMB: Automatic Differentiation and Laplace Approximation , 2015, 1509.00660.

[21]  D. Harville.  Bayesian inference for variance components using only error contrasts , 1974 .

[22]  James N. Ianelli,et al.  A Statistical Model for Stock Assessment of Southern Bluefin Tuna with Temporal Changes in Selectivity , 2003 .

[23]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Adjusting for bias due to variability of estimated recruitments in fishery assessment models , 2011 .

[24]  Auger‐Methe Marie,et al.  Template Model Builder(TMB)を利用した海洋移動データの空間時間的モデリング , 2017 .

[25]  Richard D. Methot,et al.  Stock synthesis: A biological and statistical framework for fish stock assessment and fishery management , 2013 .

[26]  Steven J. D. Martell,et al.  A historical review of selectivity approaches and retrospective patterns in the Pacific halibut stock assessment , 2014 .

[27]  DISCUSSION OF "ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE—WHY IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER" BY A. GELMAN , 2005, math/0508528.

[28]  A random effects population dynamics model based on proportions-at-age and removal data for estimating total mortality , 2012 .

[29]  André E. Punt,et al.  The promises and pitfalls of including decadal- scale climate forcing of recruitment in groundfish stock assessment , 2011 .

[30]  Anders Nielsen,et al.  Estimation of time-varying selectivity in stock assessments using state-space models , 2014 .

[31]  J. Thorson,et al.  A new role for effort dynamics in the theory of harvested populations and data-poor stock assessment , 2013 .

[32]  David B. Sampson,et al.  An exploration of the shapes and stability of population–selection curves , 2012 .