Evaluation of the Dekati mass monitor for the measurement of exhaust particle mass emissions.

The Dekati mass monitor (OMM) is an instrument which measures the mass concentration of airborne particles in real time by combining aerodynamic and mobility size particle classification. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the DMM by sampling exhaust from five engines and vehicles of different technologies in both steady-state and transient tests. DMM results are found higher than the filter-based particulate matter (PM) by 39 +/- 24% (range stands for +/- one standard deviation) for 62 diesel tests conducted in total and 3% and 14% higher, respectively, in two gasoline tests. To explore whether the difference occurs because of the different measurement principles of DMM and filter-based PM, the DMM operation is replicated over steady-state tests by combining an electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI) and a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS). The correlation of ELPI and SMPS derived mass and filter-based PM is satisfactory (R2 = 0.95) with a mean deviation of 5 +/- 15%. For the same tests, the correlation of DMM with PM was also high (R2 = 0.95), but DMM exceeded PM by 44 +/- 23% on average. The comparison of ELPI and SMPS and DMM results reveals that the latter overestimates both the geometric mean diameter and especially the width of the particle mass-weighted size distribution. These findings demonstrate thatthe statistically significant difference between the DMM and the filter-based PM cannot just originate from the different measurement principles but also from the actual implementation of the combined aerodynamic-mobility measurement in the DMM. Optimizing the DMM will require changes in its design and/or the calculation algorithm to improve the resolution and width of the aerodynamic size distribution recorded.

[1]  J. Keskinen,et al.  ELPI Response and Data Reduction I: Response Functions , 2005 .

[2]  U Lehmann,et al.  New method for time-resolved diesel engine exhaust particle mass measurement. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Structural Properties of Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility , 2004 .

[4]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Evaluation and correction of moisture adsorption and desorption from a tapered element oscillating microbalance , 2001 .

[5]  K. Coakley,et al.  Novel method to classify aerosol particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio—Aerosol particle mass analyser , 1996 .

[6]  J. Keskinen,et al.  The ELPI Response and Data Reduction II: Properties of Kernels and Data Inversion , 2005 .

[7]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  High fractal-like dimension of diesel soot agglomerates , 1998 .

[8]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[9]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Fine particle losses in electrical low-pressure impactor , 2001 .

[10]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  PM Measurement Artifact: Organic Vapor Deposition on Different Filter Media , 2004 .

[11]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Michel André,et al.  The ARTEMIS European driving cycles for measuring car pollutant emissions. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  M. Maricq,et al.  Signature size distributions for diesel and gasoline engine exhaust particulate matter , 2001 .

[14]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Method for Measuring Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Aerosol Agglomerates , 2004 .

[15]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Particulate matter mass measurements for low emitting diesel powered vehicles: what's next? , 2003 .

[16]  Xin Wang,et al.  The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density , 2002 .

[17]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[18]  Stephen J. Harris,et al.  The role of fragmentation in defining the signature size distribution of diesel soot , 2002 .

[19]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Calibration and modelling of ejector dilutors for automotive exhaust sampling , 2004 .

[20]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Effect of engine load on diesel soot particles. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Effective Density of Diesel Exhaust Particles as a Function of Size , 2002 .

[22]  M. Maricq,et al.  The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust , 2004 .

[23]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Time-Resolved Measurements of Exhaust PM for FTP-75:Comparison of LII, ELPI, and TEOM Techniques , 2004 .

[24]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Electrical Filter Stage for the ELPI , 2002 .