“When I First Got It, I Wanted to Throw It Off a Cliff”: The Challenges and Benefits of Learning AAC Technologies as Described by Adults who use AAC

Seven individuals (aged 21 – 41 years) with cerebral palsy and who used speech generating augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices participated in a focus group discussion on the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. The focus group was conducted on the Internet over a 9-week period. Five major themes emerged from the discussion: (a) selection of an AAC device; (b) knowledge and skills needed to use AAC technologies; (c) instruction and practice activities; (d) assessment of skill acquisition; and (e) advice to others. Participants reported that a consumer-driven assessment approach, which included the opportunity to discuss options with other individuals who used AAC, was key to the selection of an appropriate device. Participants identified a wide variety of important supports to learning how to make effective use of AAC technologies, including text and technological supports, individual exploration, learning from professionals, drill and practice, learning from peers, and opportunities for functional use in the community. For the participants, successful use of AAC technology was best assessed by functional use in the community.

[1]  James I. Charlton,et al.  Nothing About Us Without UsDisability Oppression and Empowerment , 1998 .

[2]  Janice Light,et al.  “Communication is the essence of human life”: reflections on communicative competence , 1997 .

[3]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  V. Wilde Controversial hypotheses on the relationship between researcher and informant in qualitative research. , 1992, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[6]  J. Sim Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology , 1996 .

[7]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise , 1993 .

[8]  J. Donovan,et al.  Research in Black and White , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[9]  Robert C. Gardner,et al.  Correlation, Causation, Motivation, and Second Language Acquisition , 2000 .

[10]  Janice C Light,et al.  Message-encoding techniques for augmentative communication systems: the recall performances of adults with severe speech impairments. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  E. Strömgren,et al.  Fifteen years later , 1978 .

[12]  Tung Bui,et al.  Effect of Student Attitude to Course Format on Learning Performance: An Empirical Study in Web vs. Lecture Instruction , 2000 .

[13]  J. Chamberlin,et al.  Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment , 1999 .

[14]  D. Koppenhaver,et al.  Childhood reading and writing experiences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments , 1991 .

[15]  D. Beukelman,et al.  An elementary student with severe expressive communication impairment in a general education classroom: Sequential analysis of interactions , 2000 .

[16]  Kathryn D R Drager,et al.  Improving the Design of Augmentative and Alternative Technologies for Young Children , 2002, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[17]  Janice C Light,et al.  ‘Getting your wheel in the door’: successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2002 .

[18]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication technology learning part 2: preprofessional students , 2002 .

[19]  Janice C Light,et al.  “Don't give up”: Employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2001 .

[20]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Survey of school speech and language service provision to students with severe communication impairments in Nebraska , 1998 .

[21]  Izabela Kojic-Sabo,et al.  Approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success , 1999 .

[22]  J. Light,et al.  Fifteen Years Later: An Investigation of the Long-Term Outcomes of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interventions. , 2001 .

[23]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Magic and cost of communicative competence , 1991 .

[24]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Enhancing Participation in Employment Through AAC Technologies , 2002, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[25]  Kathryn D R Drager,et al.  The performance of typically developing 2 1/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  Lelia L. De Andrade Negotiating from the Inside Constructing Racial and Ethnic Identity in Qualitative Research , 2000 .

[27]  Opening Up a ‘Whole New World’: Employer and Co-Worker Perspectives on Working with Individuals who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2003 .

[28]  L. D. De ANDRADE Negotiating from the Inside , 2000 .

[29]  S. Suter Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[30]  Charles A. Hughes,et al.  The Effect of Five Proofreading Conditions on the Spelling Performance of College Students with Learning Disabilities , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.