UNLABELLED
OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the relative impact of various factors that could account for differences in waiting time of cadaveric kidney transplant candidates (eg, black and sensitized patients).
DESIGN
--A cohort study using multivariate analyses to identify associations between 36 patient, donor, and center factors with waiting time for all US cadaveric kidney transplant candidates listed between October 1, 1987, and June 30, 1990. SETTING--All US kidney transplant centers. PATIENTS--The study included 23,468 cadaveric renal transplant candidates on active waiting status. RESULTS--The patient characteristics most significantly associated with increased waiting time (adjusted for all other variables) were immunologic and included presensitization to HLA antigens, O or B blood type, candidacy for a repeat transplantation, and expression of rare HLA-A or HLA-B antigen phenotypes. Nonimmunologic factors also affected waiting times, which were significantly shorter for patients younger than 15 years vs those aged 15 through 44 years (8.4 vs 12.9 months, respectively; P less than .0001), for those listed at multiple centers vs one center (7.0 vs 13.3 months, respectively; P less than .0001), or for white vs black patients (11.9 vs 15.4 months, respectively; P less than .0001). Local transplant center characteristics associated with a significantly shorter waiting time included a small number of transplantation candidates, a high (greater than 35 per million population) local kidney organ recovery rate, and an approved variance from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network allocation algorithm. CONCLUSIONS--The time renal transplant candidates must wait for kidney transplantation is influenced by several factors in addition to those expected due to immunologic reasons of donor incompatibility, the algorithms used for organ distribution, or the effectiveness of local kidney recovery. The impact of these factors should be considered as the current US system for allocating scarce donor organs for kidney transplantation is modified.
[1]
G. Danovitch,et al.
The effect of race on access and outcome in transplantation.
,
1991,
The New England journal of medicine.
[2]
P. Terasaki,et al.
The benefit and underutilization of sharing kidneys for better histocompatibility.
,
1989,
Transplantation.
[3]
F. Sanfilippo.
The influence of HLA and ABO antigens on graft rejection and survival.
,
1991,
Clinics in laboratory medicine.
[4]
W. Vaughn,et al.
THE EFFECT OF FIRST CADAVER RENAL TRANSPLANT HLA‐A, B MATCH ON SENSITIZATION LEVELS AND RETRANSPLANT RATES FOLLOWING GRAFT FAILURE
,
1987,
Transplantation.
[5]
D. Sutherland,et al.
International pancreas transplant registry report - 1988
,
1989
.
[6]
P. Kimball,et al.
Influence of race on crossmatch outcome and recipient eligibility for transplantation.
,
1992,
Transplantation.
[7]
W. Baldwin,et al.
Alloantibodies: Basic and clinical concepts
,
1991
.
[8]
R. Oriol,et al.
ABH and Lewis antigens on lymphocytes: screening of pregnant women's sera with the B-cell cytotoxicity test.
,
1979,
Transplantation proceedings.
[9]
D. Cox.
Regression Models and Life-Tables
,
1972
.
[10]
J. Mannick.
New look at HL-A typing--importance of the four antigens.
,
1973,
New England Journal of Medicine.
[11]
G. Opelz.
The benefit of exchanging donor kidneys among transplant centers.
,
1988,
The New England journal of medicine.