Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures.

The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of the two main categories of factors determining the yield and properties of biochar, i.e., feedstock properties and production conditions, here represented by the highest treatment temperature (HTT). To achieve this, a wide range of production temperatures (200-650°C) and an extensive set of diverse feedstock (n=12) were used to calculate the sensitivity. The quantitative evaluation was based on statistical analysis of coefficients of variation, and thus derived indices representing the extent of influence of the two factors, i.e., a feedstock-depended heterogeneity (HF) and a temperature-depended heterogeneity (HT). The results showed that both feedstock properties and production conditions are important for determining the yield and properties of biochar, but their respective influence changes with the property or set of properties of interest. The biochar parameters most affected by feedstock properties were e.g., total organic carbon, fixed carbon, and mineral elements of biochar. On the other hand, biochar surface area and pH was mainly influenced by highest treatment temperature. Biochar recalcitrance was mainly determined by production temperature, while the potential total C sequestration (product of recalcitrance and pyrolysis carbon yield) depended more on feedstock. Overall, the work sheds some light on the relative importance of different biochar production process parameters on the final biochar product, which is an important step towards "designed" biochar.

[1]  Stephen Joseph,et al.  Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[2]  Xinde Cao,et al.  Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[3]  K. Livi,et al.  Changes in electrical and microstructural properties of microcrystalline cellulose as function of carbonization temperature , 2010 .

[4]  Dorisel Torres,et al.  Climate change impact of biochar cook stoves in western Kenyan farm households: system dynamics model analysis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Mark H. Engelhard,et al.  Oxidation of Black Carbon by Biotic and Abiotic Processes , 2006 .

[6]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Characterization of biochars produced from cornstovers for soil amendment. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  K. Jindo,et al.  Chemical and biochemical characterisation of biochar-blended composts prepared from poultry manure. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[8]  A. Cowie,et al.  Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment , 2010 .

[9]  Li-Jung Kuo,et al.  An index-based approach to assessing recalcitrance and soil carbon sequestration potential of engineered black carbons (biochars). , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Darko Matovic,et al.  Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: Global and Canadian perspective , 2011 .

[11]  B. Herbert,et al.  Generalized two-dimensional perturbation correlation infrared spectroscopy reveals mechanisms for the development of surface charge and recalcitrance in plant-derived biochars. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Impacts of woodchip biochar additions on greenhouse gas production and sorption/degradation of two herbicides in a Minnesota soil. , 2009, Chemosphere.

[13]  L. Zwieten,et al.  Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment , 2007 .

[14]  Dandan Zhou,et al.  Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  J. O H A N N E S L E H M A N N,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Systems : Estimating the Energetic , Economic , and Climate Change Potential , 2009 .

[16]  Jin-hua Yuan,et al.  The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Wiwut Tanthapanichakoon,et al.  Pyrolysis behaviors of rice straw, rice husk, and corncob by TG-MS technique , 2007 .

[18]  C. Masiello,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of black carbon decomposition and oxidation. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Vladimir Strezov,et al.  Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  A. Zimmerman,et al.  Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Brent A. Gloy,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  D. Laird,et al.  Environmental benefits of biochar. , 2012, Journal of environmental quality.

[23]  C. Atkinson,et al.  Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[24]  L. Beesley,et al.  Effects of biochar and greenwaste compost amendments on mobility, bioavailability and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[25]  Rocky de Nys,et al.  Algal biochar--production and properties. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[26]  Weihua Zhang,et al.  Relative distribution of Pb2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar. , 2012, Water research.

[27]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars , 2011 .

[28]  V. Strezov,et al.  Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). , 2010, Chemosphere.

[29]  L. Ma,et al.  Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  Akwasi A Boateng,et al.  Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. , 2012, Journal of environmental quality.

[31]  Cordt Zollfrank,et al.  Decomposition and carbonisation of wood biopolymers—a microstructural study of softwood pyrolysis , 2005 .

[32]  Yigal Elad,et al.  Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[33]  M. Schwanninger,et al.  Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. , 2012, Journal of environmental quality.

[34]  D. Laird,et al.  Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil , 2010 .

[35]  Andrew Cross,et al.  The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods , 2013 .

[36]  K. Ro,et al.  Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[37]  Saran Sohi,et al.  Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar , 2013 .

[38]  Felipe Macías,et al.  Contribution to characterisation of biochar to estimate the labile fraction of carbon , 2011 .

[39]  P. Nico,et al.  Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). , 2010, Environmental science & technology.