Pictures and Words: Priming and Category Effects in Object Processing

This study investigated the influence of semantic priming on object processing as a function of both presentation modality and object category in a reality decision task. Participants performed a mixed decision (i.e., object and lexical decisions) on picture and word stimuli presented in isolation (Experiment 1) and in a semantic priming paradigm (Experiment 2). The results showed longer RTs and more errors for picture targets than for word targets, in both experiments. Category effects were also demonstrated: biological objects were associated with longer RTs and more errors than man made objects, only for pictures in Experiment 1 but in both modalities in Experiment 2. Thus, our data reveal a word superiority effect in reality decisions, independently of semantic priming, and provide additional evidence favoring the biological/man made dichotomy. Finally, our data show that the mixed decision task only requires lexical/structural processing when stimuli are presented in isolation and may involve implicit semantic access when participants perform the task as part of a semantic paradigm.

[1]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? , 1990 .

[2]  T. Shallice.  From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure , 1988 .

[3]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[4]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[5]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  O. Paulson,et al.  Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  E. Warrington,et al.  Evidence for modality-specific meaning systems in the brain , 1988, Nature.

[8]  Melanie Vitkovitch,et al.  Semantic priming over unrelated trials: Evidence for different effects in word and picture naming , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[9]  A. Damasio.  Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[11]  Keith R. Laws,et al.  “Illusions of Normality”: a Methodological Critique of Category-Specific Naming , 2005, Cortex.

[12]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[13]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  A. Paivio.  Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[15]  David Caplan,et al.  Constraining theories of semantic memory processing: Evidence from Dementia , 1992 .

[16]  M. Farah,et al.  Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired , 1998 .

[17]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: do pictures provide privileged access? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  D Y von Cramon,et al.  Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Junrrs F. Kri.  Recognizing Words, Pictures, and Concepts: A Comparison of Lexical, Object, and Reality Decisions , 1984 .

[20]  M. Bajo.  Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Multiple meaning systems in the brain: A case for visual semantics , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  Structural similarity and category-specificity: a refined account , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Remo Job,et al.  Naming pictures at no cost: Asymmetries in picture and word conditional naming , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Bernard Giusiano,et al.  Category specificity in object agnosia: preservation of sensorimotor experiences related to objects , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Christian Gerlach,et al.  Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  The role of visual similarity in picture categorization. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  A. Caramazza,et al.  WHAT ARE THE FACTS OF SEMANTIC CATEGORY-SPECIFIC DEFICITS? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CLINICAL EVIDENCE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[28]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Privileged access to action for objects relative to words , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[30]  John Theios,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. , 1989 .

[31]  C. Price,et al.  A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Concepts and Their Surface Representations , 1984 .

[33]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  A verbal-semantic category-specific recognition impairment , 1993 .

[34]  M Besson,et al.  The Snodgrass and Vanderwart Set Revisited: Norms for Object Manipulability and for Pictorial Ambiguity of Objects, Chimeric Objects, and Nonobjects , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[35]  L. Seifert,et al.  Activating representations in permanent memory: different benefits for pictures and words. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Leif R. Hedman,et al.  The picture superiority effect in a cross-modality recognition task , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[37]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.