Differences in perception of everyday odors: a Japanese-German cross-cultural study.

There is a growing appreciation that experience with odors may strongly influence their perception. To further investigate this, the responses of 40 Japanese and 44 age-matched German women to everyday odorants were compared. Subjects were presented with 18 stimuli in squeeze bottles and asked to rate them according to intensity, familiarity, pleasantness and edibility, to describe associations elicited by them and, if possible, to name them. One-third of the odorants were presumed to be familiar to the Japanese only, one-third to the Germans and one-third to both populations. Significant differences were found between the two populations on all measures. Better performance by the Japanese in providing appropriate descriptors for 'Japanese' odorants and by the Germans for 'European' odorants supported the pre-selection of stimuli as culture-typical. Particularly clear differences between the two populations were found in pleasantness ratings. In general, a positive relationship was found between pleasantness and judgement of stimuli as edible, suggesting that culture-specific experiences-particularly of foods-may significantly influence odor perception. Somewhat unexpectedly, significant differences were also found between the two populations in intensity ratings for some odorants. These differences did not seem simply to be artefacts of the test situation and raise the possibility that experience may even influence such basic aspects of odor perception as stimulus intensity.

[1]  A. Holley,et al.  Odor discrimination and recognition memory as a , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  W. Cain,et al.  Lability of Odor Pleasantness: Influence of Mere Exposure , 1978, Perception.

[3]  Jeanne Pager,et al.  Chapter 3 – Nutritional States, Food Odors, and Olfactory Function , 1977 .

[4]  Loredana Hvastja,et al.  Odour Memory and Odour Hedonics in Children , 1989, Perception.

[5]  M. Schleidt,et al.  Pleasure and disgust: memories and associations of pleasant and unpleasant odours in Germany and Japan , 1988 .

[6]  T. Engen.  Remembering Odors and Their Names , 1987 .

[7]  M. D. Rabin.  Experience facilitates olfactory quality discrimination , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  C. Wysocki,et al.  Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  S. Nordin,et al.  The Scandinavian Odor-Identification Test: development, reliability, validity and normative data. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  S. Saito,et al.  Effect of Verbal Cues on Recognition Memory and Pleasantness Evaluation of Unfamiliar Odors , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Boyd Gibbons,et al.  The intimate sense of smell , 1986 .

[12]  T. Engen.  Odor sensation and memory , 1991 .

[13]  The acquisition of odour hedonics , 1988 .

[14]  Thomas V. Getchell,et al.  Smell and Taste in Health and Disease , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  B. Schaal.  Olfaction in infants and children: developmental and functional perspectives , 1988 .

[16]  John Prescott,et al.  Hedonic responses to taste solutions: a cross-cultural study of Japanese and Australians , 1992 .

[17]  R. Doty,et al.  Sex differences in odor identification ability: A cross-cultural analysis , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  R. Doty.  Cross-Cultural Studies of Taste and Smell Perception , 1986 .

[19]  M. Laska,et al.  A comparison of the detection thresholds of odour mixtures and their components , 1991 .

[20]  Richard L. Doty,et al.  An examination of relationships between the pleasantness, intensity, and concentration of 10 odorous stimuli , 1975 .

[21]  R. Doty,et al.  Development of the 12‐Item Cross‐Cultural Smell Identification Test(CC‐SIT) , 1996, The Laryngoscope.

[22]  T. Engen,et al.  Associations to odors: interference, mnemonics, and verbal labeling. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[23]  E. P. Koster,et al.  Perceived fragrance complexity and its relationship to familiarity and pleasantness II , 1979 .

[24]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Memory for Odors , 1991 .

[25]  Bernice W. Polemis.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[26]  F. R. Schab,et al.  Odors and the remembrance of things past. , 1990 .

[27]  Cj Wysocki,et al.  Geographic, cross-cultural, and individual variation in human olfaction , 1991 .

[28]  D. G. Laing.  Perception of complex smells and tastes , 1989 .

[29]  W. Cain.  Odor identification by males and females: Predictions vs performance. , 1982 .