De novo designed cyclic cationic peptides as inhibitors of plant pathogenic bacteria

Head-to-tail cyclic peptides of 4-10 residues consisting of alternating hydrophilic (Lys) and hydrophobic (Leu and Phe) amino acids were synthesized and tested against the economically important plant pathogenic bacteria Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas vesicatoria and Pseudomonas syringae. The antibacterial activity, evaluated as the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), the cytotoxicity against human red blood cells and stability towards protease degradation were determined. The influence of cyclization, ring size, and replacement of l-Phe with d-Phe on antibacterial and hemolytic activities was studied and correlated with the degree of structuring and hydrophobicity. Our results showed that linear peptides were inactive against the three bacteria tested. Cyclic peptides were active only toward X. vesicatoria and P. syringae, being c(KLKLKFKLKQ) (BPC10L) the most active peptide with MIC values of 6.25 and 12.5 microM, respectively. The improved antibacterial activity of cyclic peptides compared to their linear counterparts was associated to an increase of the hydrophobicity, represented as RP-HPLC retention time (t(R)), and secondary structure content which are related to an enhanced amphipathicity. A decrease of antibacterial and hemolytic activities was observed when a d-Phe was introduced into the cyclic sequences, which was attributed to their low amphipathicity as shown by their low secondary structure content and low t(R). The small size, simple structure, bactericidal effect, and stability to protease degradation of the best peptides make them potential candidates for the development of effective antibacterial agents for use in plant protection.

[1]  Arie V. Nieuw Amerongen,et al.  Antimicrobial Peptides: Properties and Applicability , 2001, Biological chemistry.

[2]  M. Dathe,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of arginine- and tryptophan-rich hexapeptides: the effects of aromatic clusters, D-amino acid substitution and cyclization. , 2004, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.

[3]  N. Fujii,et al.  Molecular basis for membrane selectivity of an antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[4]  C. Toniolo.  Conformationally restricted peptides through short-range cyclizations. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[5]  K. Lee,et al.  Effect of D-amino acid substitution on the stability, the secondary structure, and the activity of membrane-active peptide. , 1999, Biochemical pharmacology.

[6]  Darin L. Lee,et al.  Structure–activity relationships of de novo designed cyclic antimicrobial peptides based on gramicidin S , 2003, Biopolymers.

[7]  D. Fairlie,et al.  Macrocyclic Peptidomimetics Forcing Peptides into Bioactive Conformations , 1995, Current Medicinal Chemistry.

[8]  E. Krause,et al.  Location of an amphipathic alpha-helix in peptides using reversed-phase HPLC retention behavior of D-amino acid analogs. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Jiang Hong,et al.  A Repertoire of Novel Antibacterial Diastereomeric Peptides with Selective Cytolytic Activity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  E. Bardaji,et al.  Inhibition of Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria by Short Synthetic Cecropin A-Melittin Hybrid Peptides , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  K. Hahm,et al.  Antibiotic activity of Leu-Lys rich model peptides , 2003, Biotechnology Letters.

[12]  Y. Shai,et al.  Mode of action of membrane active antimicrobial peptides. , 2002, Biopolymers.

[13]  B. Ho,et al.  De Novo Design of Potent Antimicrobial Peptides , 2004, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  B D Sykes,et al.  Dissociation of Antimicrobial and Hemolytic Activities in Cyclic Peptide Diastereomers by Systematic Alterations in Amphipathicity* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  M. Zasloff.  Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms , 2002, Nature.

[16]  K. Brogden.  Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  G. Sundin,et al.  Ecological and genetic analysis of copper and streptomycin resistance in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  Alessandro Tossi,et al.  Amphipathic α helical antimicrobial peptides. , 2001 .

[19]  R. Hancock,et al.  Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. , 1998, Trends in biotechnology.

[20]  Y. Shai,et al.  Effect of multiple aliphatic amino acids substitutions on the structure, function, and mode of action of diastereomeric membrane active peptides. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[21]  E. Montesinos,et al.  Evaluation of a Reduced Copper Spraying Program to Control Bacterial Blight of Walnut. , 2002, Plant disease.

[22]  Y. Shai,et al.  The Consequence of Sequence Alteration of an Amphipathic α-Helical Antimicrobial Peptide and Its Diastereomers* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Takanori Nakamura,et al.  Tachyplesin, a Class of Antimicrobial Peptide from the Hemocytes of the Horseshoe Crab (Tach ypleus tridentatus) , 1988 .

[24]  J. Tam,et al.  Design of Gram-negative selective antimicrobial peptides. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[25]  James P. Cain,et al.  Exploring Ramachandran and chi space: conformationally constrained amino acids and peptides in the design of bioactive polypeptide ligands. , 2004, Current medicinal chemistry.

[26]  T. Miyata,et al.  Tachyplesin, a class of antimicrobial peptide from the hemocytes of the horseshoe crab (Tachypleus tridentatus). Isolation and chemical structure. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  泉屋 信夫.  Synthetic aspects of biologically active cyclic peptides : gramicidin S and tyrocidines , 1979 .

[28]  R. Hancock,et al.  Structure-based design of an indolicidin peptide analogue with increased protease stability. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[29]  J. Cabrefiga,et al.  Analysis of Aggressiveness of Erwinia amylovora Using Disease-Dose and Time Relationships. , 2005, Phytopathology.

[30]  Reto Stöcklin,et al.  Anti‐microbial peptides: from invertebrates to vertebrates , 2004, Immunological reviews.

[31]  M. Waring.  Synthetic aspects of biologically active cyclic peptides—gramicidin S and tyrocidines By N. Izumiya, T. Kato, H. Aoyagi, M. Waki and M. Kondo. Tokyo: Kodansha. New York: John Wiley (Halsted). (1979). 166 pp. $29.95 , 1980, Cell.

[32]  L. Otvos,et al.  Antibacterial peptides isolated from insects. , 2000, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[33]  D. Andreu,et al.  Cecropin A-derived peptides are potent inhibitors of fungal plant pathogens. , 1998, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[34]  E. Boa,et al.  Plant Pathology (4th edn) , 1998 .

[35]  H. G. Boman,et al.  Antibacterial peptides: basic facts and emerging concepts , 2003, Journal of internal medicine.

[36]  Y. Shai,et al.  Cyclization of a cytolytic amphipathic alpha-helical peptide and its diastereomer: effect on structure, interaction with model membranes, and biological function. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[37]  B. Bechinger.  Structure and Function of Membrane-Lytic Peptides , 2004 .

[38]  M. Dathe,et al.  Cyclization increases the antimicrobial activity and selectivity of arginine- and tryptophan-containing hexapeptides. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[39]  R. Hancock,et al.  Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials. , 2001, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[40]  A. Vidaver.  Uses of antimicrobials in plant agriculture. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[41]  Michael R. Yeaman,et al.  Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Peptide Action and Resistance , 2003, Pharmacological Reviews.

[42]  Optimization of Microbial Specificity in Cyclic Peptides by Modulation of Hydrophobicity within a Defined Structural Framework* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  A. Tossi,et al.  Amphipathic alpha helical antimicrobial peptides: A systematic study of the effects of structural and physical properties on biological activity. , 2001 .

[44]  E. Krause,et al.  Peptide hydrophobicity controls the activity and selectivity of magainin 2 amide in interaction with membranes. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[45]  R A Houghten,et al.  Design of model amphipathic peptides having potent antimicrobial activities. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[46]  P. McCray,et al.  Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences. , 2003, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[47]  Terry D. Lee,et al.  Determination of disulphide bridges in PG‐2, an antimicrobial peptide from porcine leukocytes , 1995, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[48]  Huey W. Huang,et al.  Action of antimicrobial peptides: two-state model. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[49]  G. S. Ali,et al.  Inhibition of fungal and bacterial plant pathogens by synthetic peptides: in vitro growth inhibition, interaction between peptides and inhibition of disease progression. , 2000, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[50]  A. Waring,et al.  Direct comparison of membrane interactions of model peptides composed of only Leu and Lys residues , 2003, Biopolymers.

[51]  J. Loper,et al.  Evaluation of streptomycin, oxytetracycline, and copper resistance of Erwinia amylovora isolated from pear orchards in Washington State , 1991 .

[52]  R. Hodges,et al.  Effects of single D-amino acid substitutions on disruption of beta-sheet structure and hydrophobicity in cyclic 14-residue antimicrobial peptide analogs related to gramicidin S. , 2004, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.

[53]  B D Sykes,et al.  Development of the Structural Basis for Antimicrobial and Hemolytic Activities of Peptides Based on Gramicidin S and Design of Novel Analogs Using NMR Spectroscopy* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.