Tropical deforestation modelling: comparative analysis of different predictive approaches. The case study of Peten, Guatemala

The frequent use of predictive models for analyzing of complex, natural or artificial phenomena is changing the traditional approaches to environmental and hazard problems. The continuous improvement of computer performance allows for more detailed numerical methods, based on space-time discretisation, to be developed and run for a predictive modelling of complex real systems, reproducing the way their spatial patterns evolve and pointing out the degree of simulation accuracy. In this contribution we present an application of several methods (Geomatics, Neural Networks, Land Cover Modeler and Dinamica EGO) in the tropical training area of Peten, Guatemala. During the last few decades this region, included in the Biosphere Maya reserve, has seen a fast demographic raise and a subsequent uncontrolled pressure on its own geo-resources. The test area can be divided into several sub-regions characterized by different land use dynamics. Understanding and quantifying these differences permits a better approximation of a real system; moreover we have to consider all the physical, socio-economic parameters, which will be of use for representing the complex and sometimes random human impact. Because of the absence of detailed data from our test area, nearly all the information was derived from the image processing of 11 ETM+, TM and SPOT scenes; we studied the past environmental dynamics and we built the input layers for the predictive models. The data from 1998 and 2000 were used during the calibration to simulate the land cover changes in 2003, selected as reference date for the validation. The basic statistics permit to highlight the qualities or the weaknesses for each model on the different sub-regions.

[1]  Martin Paegelow,et al.  Various Approaches for Predicting Land Cover in Mountain Areas , 2007, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[2]  G. Foody Sub-pixel methods in remote sensing , 2004 .

[3]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[4]  Chang-Jo Chung,et al.  A Strategy for Sustainable Development of Nonrenewable Resources using Spatial Prediction Models , 2002 .

[5]  Pablo Pacheco,et al.  Calibration and validation of a model of forest disturbance in the Western Ghats, India 1920–1990 , 2004 .

[6]  Le Moigne,et al.  La théorie du système général : théorie de la modélisation , 1984 .

[7]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: an introduction , 2000 .

[8]  Tomislav Hengl,et al.  Finding the right pixel size , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[9]  R. G. Pontius Statistical Methods to Partition Effects of Quantity and Location During Comparison of Categorical Maps at Multiple Resolutions , 2002 .

[10]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Resolution Manipulation and Sub-Pixel Mapping , 2004 .

[11]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[12]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Remotely sensed estimation of forest canopy density: A comparison of the performance of four methods , 2006 .

[13]  Martin Paegelow,et al.  Possibilities and limits of prospective GIS land cover modelling—a compared case study: Garrotxes (France) and Alta Alpujarra Granadina (Spain) , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Yelena Ogneva-Himmelberger,et al.  Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: comparing survey and satellite data , 2001 .

[15]  Vincent C. S. Lee,et al.  A multivariate neuro-fuzzy system for foreign currency risk management decision making , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[16]  A. Pavé Modélisation et simulation d'écosystèmes. Des modèles déterministes aux simulations à événements discrets , 1999 .

[17]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification , 2000 .

[18]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition , 2002 .