Development of cross-anchored dual-core self-centering braces for seismic resistance

Abstract The steel dual-core self-centering brace (SCB) is an innovative structural member that provides both energy dissipation and re-centering properties to structures, reducing the residual drift of braced structures in earthquakes. The axial deformation capacity of the brace is doubled by using two inner cores and one outer box and by serial axial deformations of two sets of parallel tensioning elements. The original dual-core SCB that used E-glass fiber tendons or T-700 carbon fiber tendons as tensioning elements exhibited good self-centering and energy dissipation up to an interstory drift of 2.5%. The new cross-anchored dual-core SCB halves the work required to apply the initial post-tensioning forces to tendons. The potential use of high-strength steel tendons as tensioning elements is studied herein, and the effects of the number of cycles on the brace behavior, energy dissipation, and durability of the steel tendon-anchorage system are also examined. First, the mechanics and cyclic behavior of the new brace are explained; a 7950 mm-long cross-anchored dual-core SCB is then tested six times. The cross-anchored dual-core SCB exhibits excellent self-centering property up to a drift of 2.5% and a maximum axial load of 1700 kN. No damage to the steel tendons, anchors or bracing members is found after three cyclic loading tests with increasing displacement amplitudes and 60 low-cycle fatigue tests. Finite element analysis further confirms the hysteretic responses and mechanics of the cross-anchored dual-core SCB in the cyclic test.

[1]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame , 2007 .

[2]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Cyclic tests of post‐tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands , 2006 .

[3]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Column restraint in post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frames , 2009 .

[4]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Steel Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2004 .

[5]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames , 2002 .

[6]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces , 2010 .

[7]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Development of Steel Dual-Core Self-Centering Braces: Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests and Finite Element Analyses , 2015 .

[8]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Design and Testing of an Enhanced-Elongation Telescoping Self-Centering Energy-Dissipative Brace , 2015 .

[9]  Constantin Christopoulos,et al.  Seismic Response of Multistory Buildings with Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Steel Braces , 2008 .

[10]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Frame and Brace Action Forces on Steel Corner Gusset Plate Connections in Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2012 .

[11]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Bracing System for the Seismic Resistance of Structures: Development and Validation , 2008 .

[12]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Steel braced frames with dual-core SCBs and sandwiched BRBs: Mechanics, modeling and seismic demands , 2014 .

[13]  Kazuhiko Kasai,et al.  Full-scale tests of passively-controlled 5-story steel building using E-Defense shake table Part 2: Preliminary analysis results , 2009 .

[14]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Development of floor slab for steel post-tensioned self-centering moment frames , 2011 .

[15]  Richard Sause,et al.  Posttensioned Seismic-Resistant Connections for Steel Frames , 2001 .

[16]  Matthew R. Eatherton,et al.  Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace , 2012 .

[17]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Steel buckling‐restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses , 2012 .

[18]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Seismic design and shake table tests of a steel post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frame with a slab accommodating frame expansion , 2011 .

[19]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Compressive behavior of dual-gusset-plate connections for buckling-restrained braced frames , 2012 .

[20]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[21]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Evaluating performance of post‐tensioned steel connections with strands and reduced flange plates , 2006 .

[22]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test Building , 1999 .