The deep play of medicine: discursive and collaborative processing of evidence in medical problem solving.

Ethnographic research was conducted in the thoracic ward of a Norwegian university hospital in order to study collaborative medical problem solving. As a general principle, evidence-based medicine is supposed to lead the process of medical problem solving. However, medical problem solving also requires evidence of a different kind. This is the more concrete form of evidence, such as X rays and other representations, that guides medical practice and makes sure that decisions are grounded in sound empirical facts and knowledge. In medicine, 'evidence' is on the one hand an abstract category; on the other hand, it is a tool that is practically enacted during the problem-solving work. Medical evidence does not 'show itself'. As such it has an emergent quality. Medical evidence has to be established and made practically useful in the collaborative settings by the participants in order to make conclusions about diagnoses and treatment. Hence, evidence is an interactional product; it is discursively generated and its applicability requires discourse. In addition, the production of medical evidence requires more than medical discourse and professional considerations. This paper looks at the production processes and use of medical evidence and the ambiguous meaning of this term in practical medicine.

[1]  Erving Goffman,et al.  The Nature of Deference and Demeanor , 1956 .

[2]  V. Turner.  The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure , 1971 .

[3]  E. Goffman.  Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[4]  E. Mishler,et al.  Discourse Of Medicine Dialectics Of Medical Interviews , 2017 .

[5]  Aaron V. Cicourel,et al.  The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters , 1987 .

[6]  R. Anspach.  Notes on the sociology of medical discourse: the language of case presentation. , 1988, Journal of health and social behavior.

[7]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[8]  M. Field,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program , 1990 .

[9]  Aaron V. Cicourel,et al.  The integration of distributed knowledge in collaborative medical diagnosis , 1990 .

[10]  M. Berg.  The construction of medical disposals Medical sociology and medical problem solving in clinical practice , 1992 .

[11]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[12]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Medical talk and medical work , 1995 .

[13]  I. Hacking.  The Social Construction of What , 1999 .

[14]  Introduction: Discursive hybridity in medical work , 1999 .

[15]  S. Sarangi,et al.  Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher , 1999 .

[16]  S. Slembrouck,et al.  The legitimation of the client and the profession: identities and roles in social work discourse , 1999 .

[17]  Martin James Kitchener,et al.  The `Bureaucratization' of Professional Roles: The Case of Clinical Directors in UK Hospitals , 2000 .

[18]  Er behandlingen av lungekreft i Norge god nok , 2002 .

[19]  S. Timmermanns,et al.  The Challenge of Evidence-Based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care , 2003 .

[20]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[21]  Governing Medicine: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[22]  D. Hunter,et al.  Making clinical governance work , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.