Patient-specific predictors of image noise in coronary CT angiography.

BACKGROUND Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography can be associated with high radiation exposure. Reduction of tube voltage from 120 kV to 100 kV can reduce the dose by up to 40%, but it also increases image noise. OBJECTIVE We aimed to find a patient-specific predictor of image noise to determine the use of reduced tube voltage. METHODS Contrast-enhanced coronary dual-source CT angiography data sets [prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered axial and retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition, rotation of 280 milliseconds, 2 × 128 × 0.6 mm collimation, 100 kV, 320 mAs] of 165 patients (age, 54 ± 13 years) for the detection of coronary artery stenoses were analyzed. Image noise was measured in the aortic root. Influence of body weight, height, body mass index, thoracic cross sectional area, as well as the area of the thoracic solid tissue were analyzed. RESULTS Mean image noise in the aorta was 35.1 ± 8.9 HU. Mean dose length product was 207 ± 184 cm · cGy with an average effective dose of 2.9 ± 2.6 mSv. The patient cohort was divided into tertiles according to image noise. Numerous parameters, including BMI and body weight, were significantly different between the highest and lowest tertiles. In multivariable regression analysis, the area of the thoracic solid tissue was the only independent predictor of image noise (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The area of the thoracic solid tissue at the level of the aortic root predicts image noise and may hence be used for the decision to reduce tube voltage from 120 kV to 100 kV.

[1]  J. Earls,et al.  Individualized tube current selection for 64-row cardiac CTA based on analysis of the scout view. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Ralf W. Bauer,et al.  Accuracy of coronary artery stenosis detection with CT versus conventional coronary angiography compared with composite findings from both tests as an enhanced reference standard , 2011, European Radiology.

[3]  Michael Uder,et al.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose , 2008, European Radiology.

[6]  J. Min,et al.  The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[7]  Yeung Yam,et al.  Incremental Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease Using CONFIRM: COroNary Computed Tomography Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  Jan Menke,et al.  Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[11]  K. Kofoed,et al.  Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[12]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  Impact on image quality and radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography: 100 kVp versus 120 kVp , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[14]  T. Brady,et al.  Direct chest area measurement: A potential anthropometric replacement for BMI to inform cardiac CT dose parameters? , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[15]  N. Sandgaard,et al.  Patients' Views of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography Compared With Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2012, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[16]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[17]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[18]  T. Villines,et al.  Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging by Coronary CT Angiography , 2011 .

[19]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[21]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  S. Abbara ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2011 .

[23]  L Desbiolles,et al.  Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance , 2008, Heart.

[24]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[25]  R. Fattori,et al.  Incremental Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[26]  Katsuhide Ito,et al.  Effect of Heart Rate and Body Mass Index on the Interscan and Interobserver Variability of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring at Prospective ECG-Triggered 64-Slice CT , 2009, Korean journal of radiology.

[27]  H. Hatabu,et al.  Correlation between image noise and body weight in coronary CTA with 16-row MDCT. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[28]  Practicality, safety and accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in the evaluation of low TIMI‐risk score chest pain patients: A pilot study , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[29]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  M. Kalra,et al.  Correlation of Patient Weight and Cross-Sectional Dimensions with Subjective Image Quality at Standard Dose Abdominal CT , 2003, Korean journal of radiology.

[31]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[32]  J. Min,et al.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[33]  J Simon,et al.  Detection of coronary calcifications: feasibility of dose reduction with a body weight-adapted examination protocol. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[35]  R. Wu,et al.  Image quality and dose performance of 80 kV low dose scan protocol in high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography: feasibility study , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[36]  H. Kashani,et al.  Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: tube current adaptation based on anterior–posterior chest diameter , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[37]  S. Abbara,et al.  Cardiac CT: State of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis , 2008 .

[38]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Automated Attenuation-Based Tube Potential Selection for Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography Angiography: Improved Dose Effectiveness , 2011, Investigative radiology.