Patient-specific predictors of image noise in coronary CT angiography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dieter Ropers | Gerd Muschiol | Michael Lell | Mohamed Marwan | Stephan Achenbach | Tobias Pflederer | Annika Schuhbaeck | S. Achenbach | D. Ropers | W. Daniel | M. Lell | C. Hamm | A. Schuhbaeck | M. Marwan | G. Muschiol | T. Pflederer | S. Gauss | J. Rixe | Johannes Rixe | Christian Hamm | Werner G Daniel | Marcella Schaefer | Soeren Gauss | Marcella Schaefer
[1] J. Earls,et al. Individualized tube current selection for 64-row cardiac CTA based on analysis of the scout view. , 2011, European journal of radiology.
[2] Ralf W. Bauer,et al. Accuracy of coronary artery stenosis detection with CT versus conventional coronary angiography compared with composite findings from both tests as an enhanced reference standard , 2011, European Radiology.
[3] Michael Uder,et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[4] Udo Hoffmann,et al. Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[5] Simon Wildermuth,et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose , 2008, European Radiology.
[6] J. Min,et al. The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[7] Yeung Yam,et al. Incremental Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease Using CONFIRM: COroNary Computed Tomography Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[8] Jan Menke,et al. Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. , 2005, Radiology.
[9] Bernhard Bischoff,et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[10] S. Achenbach,et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.
[11] K. Kofoed,et al. Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[12] Jörg Hausleiter,et al. Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.
[13] Impact on image quality and radiation exposure in coronary CT angiography: 100 kVp versus 120 kVp , 2010, Acta radiologica.
[14] T. Brady,et al. Direct chest area measurement: A potential anthropometric replacement for BMI to inform cardiac CT dose parameters? , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[15] N. Sandgaard,et al. Patients' Views of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography Compared With Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2012, Journal of thoracic imaging.
[16] G. W. Snedecor. Statistical Methods , 1964 .
[17] Fuminari Tatsugami,et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.
[18] T. Villines,et al. Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging by Coronary CT Angiography , 2011 .
[19] M. Budoff,et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[20] Jörg Hausleiter,et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.
[21] Mathias Prokop,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] S. Abbara. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2011 .
[23] L Desbiolles,et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance , 2008, Heart.
[24] Jörg Hausleiter,et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[25] R. Fattori,et al. Incremental Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[26] Katsuhide Ito,et al. Effect of Heart Rate and Body Mass Index on the Interscan and Interobserver Variability of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring at Prospective ECG-Triggered 64-Slice CT , 2009, Korean journal of radiology.
[27] H. Hatabu,et al. Correlation between image noise and body weight in coronary CTA with 16-row MDCT. , 2006, Academic radiology.
[28] Practicality, safety and accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in the evaluation of low TIMI‐risk score chest pain patients: A pilot study , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.
[29] Dieter Ropers,et al. Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[30] M. Kalra,et al. Correlation of Patient Weight and Cross-Sectional Dimensions with Subjective Image Quality at Standard Dose Abdominal CT , 2003, Korean journal of radiology.
[31] G. Hillis,et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.
[32] J. Min,et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[33] J Simon,et al. Detection of coronary calcifications: feasibility of dose reduction with a body weight-adapted examination protocol. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[34] Werner Jaschke,et al. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. , 2010, European journal of radiology.
[35] R. Wu,et al. Image quality and dose performance of 80 kV low dose scan protocol in high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography: feasibility study , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[36] H. Kashani,et al. Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: tube current adaptation based on anterior–posterior chest diameter , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[37] S. Abbara,et al. Cardiac CT: State of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis , 2008 .
[38] Rainer Raupach,et al. Automated Attenuation-Based Tube Potential Selection for Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography Angiography: Improved Dose Effectiveness , 2011, Investigative radiology.