Impaired generalization of speaker identity in the perception of familiar and unfamiliar voices.

In 2 behavioral experiments, we explored how the extraction of identity-related information from familiar and unfamiliar voices is affected by naturally occurring vocal flexibility and variability, introduced by different types of vocalizations and levels of volitional control during production. In a first experiment, participants performed a speaker discrimination task on vowels, volitional (acted) laughter, and spontaneous (authentic) laughter from 5 unfamiliar speakers. We found that performance was significantly impaired for spontaneous laughter, a vocalization produced under reduced volitional control. We additionally found that the detection of identity-related information fails to generalize across different types of nonverbal vocalizations (e.g., laughter vs. vowels) and across mismatches in volitional control within vocalization pairs (e.g., volitional laughter vs. spontaneous laughter), with performance levels indicating an inability to discriminate between speakers. In a second experiment, we explored whether personal familiarity with the speakers would afford greater accuracy and better generalization of identity perception. Using new stimuli, we largely replicated our previous findings: whereas familiarity afforded a consistent performance advantage for speaker discriminations, the experimental manipulations impaired performance to similar extents for familiar and unfamiliar listener groups. We discuss our findings with reference to prototype-based models of voice processing and suggest potential underlying mechanisms and representations of familiar and unfamiliar voice perception. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  Susan M. Hughes,et al.  The Perception and Parameters of Intentional Voice Manipulation , 2014 .

[2]  W. Sommer,et al.  Recognizing famous voices: influence of stimulus duration and different types of retrieval cues. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Laughter in Conversation: Features of Occurrence and Acoustic Structure , 2004 .

[5]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  The acoustic features of human laughter. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Pascal Belin,et al.  Norm-Based Coding of Voice Identity in Human Auditory Cortex , 2013, Current Biology.

[7]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Phonagnosia: A Dissociation Between Familiar and Unfamiliar Voices , 1988, Cortex.

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[9]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[11]  Greg J. Neil,et al.  Hearing Faces and Seeing Voices: The Integration and Interaction of Face and Voice Processing , 2014 .

[12]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  Respiratory muscles in speech. , 1959, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  G Strube,et al.  The role of language familiarity in voice identification , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[14]  C. McGettigan,et al.  Increased Discriminability of Authenticity from Multimodal Laughter is Driven by Auditory Information , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Véronique Aubergé,et al.  Can we hear the prosody of smile? , 2003, Speech Commun..

[17]  S. K. Scott,et al.  Individual Differences in Laughter Perception Reveal Roles for Mentalizing and Sensorimotor Systems in the Evaluation of Emotional Authenticity , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  P. Ekman,et al.  The expressive pattern of laughter , 2001 .

[19]  Jenny Hadfield,et al.  I Recognise you but I Can't Place you: An Investigation of Familiar-only Experiences during Tests of Voice and Face Recognition , 1998 .

[20]  D. Lancker,et al.  Voice discrimination and recognition are separate abilities , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  N. Lass,et al.  Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  P. Belin,et al.  Thinking the voice: neural correlates of voice perception , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  F. Craik,et al.  Earwitness identification: Some influences on voice recognition. , 1995 .

[24]  C. Athena Aktipis,et al.  The animal nature of spontaneous human laughter , 2014 .

[25]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Acoustic correlates of talker sex and individual talker identity are present in a short vowel segment produced in running speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  A. Yarmey,et al.  Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in showups and lineups , 1996 .

[27]  Jody Kreiman,et al.  Comparing discrimination and recognition of unfamiliar voices , 1991, Speech Commun..

[28]  S. Scott Voice processing in monkey and human brains , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Sarah B. Herald,et al.  Phonagnosia, a Voice Homologue to Prosopagnosia. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[31]  Meike Ramon,et al.  Real-life experience with personally familiar faces enhances discrimination based on global information , 2016, PeerJ.

[32]  Jody Kreiman,et al.  In the Beginning Was the Familiar Voice: Personally Familiar Voices in the Evolutionary and Contemporary Biology of Communication , 2012, Integrative psychological & behavioral science.

[33]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[34]  John D E Gabrieli,et al.  Human Voice Recognition Depends on Language Ability , 2011, Science.

[35]  S. Linville,et al.  The sound of senescence. , 1996, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[36]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Listeners judge talker sex more efficiently from male than from female vowels , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Words Get in the Way: Linguistic Effects on Talker Discrimination , 2017, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  A. Yarmey,et al.  Long-term auditory memory: speaker identification. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  H. A. Mcallister,et al.  Effects of Lineup Modality on Witness Credibility , 1993 .

[40]  Jody Kreiman,et al.  Foundations of Voice Studies: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Voice Production and Perception , 2011 .

[41]  Katharina von Kriegstein,et al.  How do we recognise who is speaking? , 2014, Frontiers in bioscience.

[42]  Yizhar Lavner,et al.  The effects of acoustic modifications on the identification of familiar voices speaking isolated vowels , 2000, Speech Commun..

[43]  I R Titze,et al.  On the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in phonation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  K. Wheldall,et al.  Pitch alterations in British motherese: some preliminary acoustic data , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[45]  Jennifer M. Fellowes,et al.  Talker identification based on phonetic information. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  H. Cowles,et al.  Spontaneous Voice Gender Imitation Abilities in Adult Speakers , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[48]  A. Ohman,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  P. Belin,et al.  Understanding voice perception. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[50]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Laugh Like You Mean It: Authenticity Modulates Acoustic, Physiological and Perceptual Properties of Laughter , 2016 .

[51]  Pascal Belin,et al.  Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers , 2010, Psychological research.