Long-term optimal allocation of hydro generation for a price-maker company in a competitive market: latest developments and a stochastic dual dynamic programming approach

Since the liberalisation of the power industry, there has been a large amount of literature on the determination of optimal bidding decisions for price-maker energy producers. The vast majority of the work developed so far has focused on short-term horizons and may be viewed as successful approaches for systems whose operation is generally deterministic. In the case of price-maker hydro plants with significant storage capacity, however, the solution of the strategic bidding problem is more subtle. The reason is that hydro reservoirs allow the bidder to postpone energy production if future prices are expected to be higher than the current price. This demands the management of an energy-constrained resource and determines a time-coupling characteristic to the problem, implying that the bidding strategy should ideally take into account the following stages and consider the stochasticity of inflows. These aspects characterise the strategic bidding for price-maker hydro agents as a multi-stage stochastic programming problem, with significant computational challenges. The objective of this work is to present a new methodology for the strategic bidding problem of a price-maker hydropower-based company, taking into account several hydro plants, time-coupling and stochastic inflow scenarios. The proposed approach considers a deterministic residual demand curve and is based on stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP), which has been successfully applied to the least-cost hydrothermal scheduling problem. Since the technique requires the problem to be concave, a piecewise linear approximation of the expected future benefit function is proposed. The application of the methodology is exemplified with a real case study based on the hydrothermal system of El Salvador.

[1]  Horand I. Gassmann,et al.  Mslip: A computer code for the multistage stochastic linear programming problem , 1990, Math. Program..

[2]  John R. Birge,et al.  Decomposition and Partitioning Methods for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programs , 1985, Oper. Res..

[3]  J. Pang,et al.  Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: an MPEC approach , 2000 .

[4]  Zhang Yan,et al.  A review on risk-constrained hydropower scheduling in deregulated power market , 2008 .

[5]  A. Gjelsvik,et al.  Stochastic dual dynamic programming for seasonal scheduling in the Norwegian power system , 1992 .

[6]  S. Granville,et al.  Strategic bidding under uncertainty: a binary expansion approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Geoffrey Pritchard,et al.  Market Offering Strategies for Hydroelectric Generators , 2003, Oper. Res..

[8]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Hedging electricity portfolios via stochastic programming , 2002 .

[9]  E. Read OR Modelling for a Deregulated Electricity Sector , 1996 .

[10]  John R. Birge,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1997 .

[11]  M. V. F. Pereira,et al.  Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning , 1991, Math. Program..

[12]  T. Overbye,et al.  An Individual Welfare Maximation Algorithm for Electricity Markets , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[13]  M. Ventosa,et al.  Optimal offering strategies for generation companies operating in electricity spot markets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  N. P. Ziogos,et al.  Electricity Producer Offering Strategies in Day-Ahead Energy Market With Step-Wise Offers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  J. Contreras,et al.  Optimal response of an oligopolistic generating company to a competitive pool-based electric power market , 2002 .

[16]  Javier Contreras,et al.  Price maker self-scheduling in a pool-based electricity market: a mixed-integer LP approach , 2002 .

[17]  M.E.P. Maceira,et al.  A Four-Dimensional Model of Hydro Generation for the Short-Term Hydrothermal Dispatch Problem Considering Head and Spillage Effects , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  James Bushnell,et al.  Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures , 1999 .

[19]  H. Rudnick,et al.  Hydrothermal Market Simulator Using Game Theory: Assessment of Market Power , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[20]  S. Hunt,et al.  Making Competition Work in Electricity , 2002 .

[21]  M.V.F. Pereira,et al.  Stochastic optimization of a hydro-thermal system including network constraints , 1991 .

[22]  M. Pereira,et al.  Stochastic Optimization of a Multireservoir Hydroelectric System: A Decomposition Approach , 1985 .

[23]  George Gross,et al.  Generation Supply Bidding in Perfectly Competitive Electricity Markets , 2000, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[24]  John R. Birge,et al.  The Abridged Nested Decomposition Method for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programs with Relatively Complete Recourse , 2006, Algorithmic Oper. Res..

[25]  James Bushnell,et al.  A Mixed Complementarity Model of Hydrothermal Electricity Competition in the Western United States , 2003, Oper. Res..

[26]  J. Cabero,et al.  A medium-term integrated risk management model for a hydrothermal generation company , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Ts Halliburton An optimal hydrothermal planning model for the New Zealand power system , 2004 .

[28]  M. Ventosa,et al.  Modeling competition in electric energy markets by equilibrium constraints , 1999 .

[29]  Javier García-González,et al.  Risk-averse profit-based optimal scheduling of a hydro-chain in the day-ahead electricity market , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..