Use of fMRI in the Study of Chronic Aphasia Recovery After Therapy: A Case Study

Abstract Purpose: The role of intensity of aphasia therapy was investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to document changes in neural activation patterns associated with massed versus distributed therapy in an individual with chronic conduction aphasia. Method: Language therapy targeted word-finding deficits and phonological processing. fMRI scans were acquired at baseline, after massed therapy, and after distributed therapy. Results: Treatment was effective, as demonstrated by increases in performance on standardized measures, narrative analysis, and task performance in the fMRI scanner. Task improvement across fMRI testing sessions corresponded with increases in fMRI blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal. Greatest behavioral gains and BOLD signal increases occurred after massed therapy, with slight gains accompanying distributed therapy. Increases in fMRI BOLD signal occurred after therapy in left basal ganglia and right hemisphere frontotemporal cortex. Conclusions: Intensity of aphasia therapy impacts the recovery process and warrants additional research. Basal ganglia and right hemisphere structures may be important neural substrates for aphasia recovery.

[1]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions , 1999, NeuroImage.

[2]  A. Kertesz The Western Aphasia Battery , 1982 .

[3]  T. Schallert,et al.  Use-dependent structural events in recovery of function. , 1997, Advances in neurology.

[4]  Myoung-Hwan Ko,et al.  Reorganization of cortical language areas in patients with aphasia: a functional MRI study. , 2002, Yonsei medical journal.

[5]  J. Démonet,et al.  Functional MRI Follow-Up Study of Language Processes in Healthy Subjects and During Recovery in a Case of Aphasia , 2004, Stroke.

[6]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Brain regions essential for improved lexical access in an aged aphasic patient: a case report , 2006, BMC neurology.

[7]  T. Schallert,et al.  Should the injured and intact hemispheres be treated differently during the early phases of physical restorative therapy in experimental stroke or parkinsonism? , 2003, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[8]  A. Basso How intensive/prolonged should an intensive/prolonged treatment be? , 2005 .

[9]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[10]  R W Cox,et al.  Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  Paolo Vitali,et al.  Training-Induced Brain Remapping in Chronic Aphasia: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  M. Just,et al.  Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[13]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Recovery of motor and language abilities after stroke: the contribution of functional imaging , 2002, Progress in neurobiology.

[14]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Long-Term Stability of Improved Language Functions in Chronic Aphasia After Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  R. Teasell,et al.  Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery , 2003, Stroke.

[16]  Keith D. White,et al.  Functional MRI of Language in Aphasia: A Review of the Literature and the Methodological Challenges , 2007, Neuropsychology Review.

[17]  S. Nadeau,et al.  Treatability of different components of aphasia - insights from a case study. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Kyung K Peck,et al.  Neural substrates of syntactic mapping treatment: An fMRI study of two cases , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[19]  Megan E. Gaiefsky,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before and After Aphasia Therapy: Shifts in Hemodynamic Time to Peak During an Overt Language Task , 2004, Stroke.

[20]  A. Léger,et al.  Neural Substrates of Spoken Language Rehabilitation in an Aphasic Patient: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  H. Karbe,et al.  Brain Plasticity in Poststroke Aphasia: What Is the Contribution of the Right Hemisphere? , 1998, Brain and Language.

[22]  T. Carr,et al.  Comparing the outcomes of intensive and non-intensive context-based aphasia treatment , 2005 .

[23]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[24]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Longitudinal fMRI study of aphasia recovery in frontal stroke , 2004, Brain and Language.

[25]  R. R. Robey A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[27]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Keith D. White,et al.  Role of the Right and Left Hemispheres in Recovery of Function during Treatment of Intention in Aphasia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Julius Fridriksson,et al.  Neural recruitment associated with anomia treatment in aphasia , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  William D. Hula,et al.  Translational research in aphasia: from neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[31]  Leora R Cherney,et al.  Task-dependent changes in brain activation following therapy for nonfluent aphasia: Discussion of two individual cases , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[32]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Intensive language training enhances brain plasticity in chronic aphasia , 2004, BMC Biology.

[33]  N. Alpert,et al.  Positron brain imaging—Normal patterns and asymmetries , 1982, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  High contrast and fast three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at high fields , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Use-Dependent Exaggeration of Neuronal Injury after Unilateral Sensorimotor Cortex Lesions. , 1999 .

[36]  Xiaojun Xu,et al.  Cortical language activation in aphasia: a functional MRI study. , 2004, Chinese medical journal.

[37]  Diane Kendall,et al.  A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of Constraint Induced Language Therapy , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[38]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  G. Harrington,et al.  Intensive semantic intervention in fluent aphasia: A pilot study with fMRI , 2006 .

[40]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Neural correlates of phonological and semantic-based anomia treatment in aphasia , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  Susan D Horn,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[43]  Julius Fridriksson,et al.  Cortical activation and language task difficulty in aphasia , 2005, Aphasiology.

[44]  Cathy J Price,et al.  The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.