3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: An in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment.

OBJECTIVE Urethral stricture is a common condition seen after urethral injury. The currently available treatments are inadequate and there is a scarcity of substitute materials used for treatment of urethral stricture. The traditional tissue engineering of urethra involves scaffold design, fabrication and processing of multiple cell types. METHODS In this study, we have used 3D bioprinting technology to fabricate cell-laden urethra in vitro with different polymer types and structural characteristics. We hypothesized that use of PCL and PLCL polymers with a spiral scaffold design could mimic the structure and mechanical properties of natural urethra of rabbits, and cell-laden fibrin hydrogel could give a better microenvironment for cell growth. With using an integrated bioprinting system, tubular scaffold was formed with the biomaterials; meanwhile, urothelial cells (UCs) and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were delivered evenly into inner and outer layers of the scaffold separately within the cell-laden hydrogel. RESULTS The PCL/PLCL (50:50) spiral scaffold demonstrated mechanical properties equivalent to the native urethra in rabbit. Evaluation of the cell bioactivity in the bioprinted urethra revealed that UCs and SMCs maintained more than 80% viability even at 7days after printing. Both cell types also showed active proliferation and maintained the specific biomarkers in the cell-laden hydrogel. CONCLUSION These results provided a foundation for further studies in 3D bioprinting of urethral constructs that mimic the natural urethral tissue in mechanical properties and cell bioactivity, as well a possibility of using the bioprinted construct for in vivo study of urethral implantation in animal model. SIGNIFICANCE OF STATEMENTS The 3D bioprinting is a new technique to replace traditional tissue engineering. The present study is the first demonstration that it is feasible to create a urethral construct. Two kinds of biomaterials were used and achieved mechanical properties equivalent to that of native rabbit urethra. Bladder epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells were loaded in hydrogel and maintained sufficient viability and proliferation in the hydrogel. The highly porous scaffold could mimic a natural urethral base-membrane, and facilitate contacts between the printed epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells on both sides of the scaffold. These results provided a strong foundation for future studies on 3D bioprinted urethra.

[1]  Weixin Zhao,et al.  Comparative study of different seeding methods based on a multilayer SIS scaffold: Which is the optimal procedure for urethral tissue engineering? , 2016, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[2]  Manjeet Mapara,et al.  Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research , 2012, Dental research journal.

[3]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study , 2011, The Lancet.

[4]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Biomedical Applications of Biodegradable Polymers. , 2011, Journal of polymer science. Part B, Polymer physics.

[5]  Chen-liang Deng,et al.  The effect of mechanical extension stimulation combined with epithelial cell sorting on outcomes of implanted tissue-engineered muscular urethras. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[6]  Mark A. Ganter,et al.  3D-printed mechanochromic materials. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[7]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications , 2012, Biofabrication.

[8]  Keekyoung Kim,et al.  3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. , 2016, Biotechnology advances.

[9]  Robert Langer,et al.  Advances in tissue engineering. , 2015, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[10]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[12]  James J. Yoo,et al.  A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds for reconstruction of long urethral defects: a preclinical study. , 2013, European urology.

[14]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Regenerative medicine: Current therapies and future directions , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  C. Stief,et al.  Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments. , 2013, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[16]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Bioprinted Amniotic Fluid‐Derived Stem Cells Accelerate Healing of Large Skin Wounds , 2012, Stem cells translational medicine.

[17]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Bioprinting technology and its applications. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  J Malda,et al.  Bioprinting of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable mechanical properties , 2011, Biofabrication.

[19]  S. Bolduc,et al.  Clinical challenges in tissue-engineered urethral reconstruction , 2016, Translational andrology and urology.

[20]  M Nakamura,et al.  Biomatrices and biomaterials for future developments of bioprinting and biofabrication , 2010, Biofabrication.

[21]  B. Breyer,et al.  Male urethral strictures and their management , 2014, Nature Reviews Urology.

[22]  J. R. Ruud Bosch,et al.  Tissue Engineering for Human Urethral Reconstruction: Systematic Review of Recent Literature , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  A. Atala,et al.  Tissue engineering in urethral reconstruction. , 2014, Archivos españoles de urología.

[24]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  A. Atala Tissue Engineering of the Urethra , 2008 .

[26]  E. Oosterwijk,et al.  Ureteral tissue engineering: where are we and how to proceed? , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.