Scaled CFS-PML: it is more robust, more accurate, more efficient, and simple to implement. Why aren't you using it?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M.W. Chevalier,et al. A PML using a convolutional curl operator and a numerical reflection coefficient for general linear media , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.
[2] Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al. Evanescent waves in PML's: origin of the numerical reflection in wave-structure interaction problems , 1999 .
[3] Stephen D. Gedney,et al. Convolution PML (CPML): An efficient FDTD implementation of the CFS–PML for arbitrary media , 2000 .
[4] Raj Mittra,et al. Frequency dependence of the constitutive parameters of causal perfectly matched anisotropic absorbers , 1996 .
[5] J. Bérenger. Perfectly matched layer for the FDTD solution of wave-structure interaction problems , 1996 .
[6] J.-P. Wrenger,et al. Numerical reflection from FDTD-PMLs: a comparison of the split PML with the unsplit and CFS PMLs , 2002 .
[7] Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .
[8] S. Gedney. An anisotropic perfectly matched layer-absorbing medium for the truncation of FDTD lattices , 1996 .