The δ-Quantum Machine, the k-Model, and the Non-ordinary Spatiality of Quantum Entities

The purpose of this article is threefold. Firstly, it aims to present, in an educational and non-technical fashion, the main ideas at the basis of Aerts’ creation-discovery view and hidden measurement approach: a fundamental explanatory framework whose importance, in this author’s view, has been seriously underappreciated by the physics community, despite its success in clarifying many conceptual challenges of quantum physics. Secondly, it aims to introduce a new quantum machine—that we call the δ quantum machine—which is able to reproduce the transmission and reflection probabilities of a one-dimensional quantum scattering process by a Dirac delta-function potential. The machine is used not only to demonstrate the pertinence of the above mentioned explanatory framework, in the general description of physical systems, but also to illustrate (in the spirit of Aerts’ ∊-model) the origin of classical and quantum structures, by revealing the existence of processes which are neither classical nor quantum, but irreducibly intermediate. We do this by explicitly introducing what we call the k-model and by proving that its processes cannot be modelized by a classical or quantum scattering system. The third purpose of this work is to exploit the powerful metaphor provided by our quantum machine, to investigate the intimate relation between the concept of potentiality and the notion of non-spatiality, that we characterize in precise terms, introducing for this the new concept of process-actuality.

[1]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[2]  Center Leo Apostel Relativity Theory : what is Reality ? ∗ , 1996 .

[3]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Construction of reality and its influence on the understanding of quantum structures , 1992 .

[4]  S. Smets The modes of physical properties in the logical foundations of physics , 2005 .

[5]  R. Morrow,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1968 .

[6]  Luigi Accardi,et al.  On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[7]  I. Segal Postulates for General Quantum Mechanics , 1947 .

[8]  H. Rauch NEUTRON INTERFEROMETRIC TESTS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS , 1986 .

[9]  Diederik Aerts Framework for possible unification of quantum and relativity theories , 1996 .

[10]  M. Born Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge , 1926 .

[11]  Towards a framework for possible uniflcation of quantum and relativity theories , 1996 .

[12]  I. Pitowsky Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic , 1989 .

[13]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  Ephemeral Properties and the Illusion of Microscopic Particles , 2010, 1008.2450.

[14]  M. O. Vassell,et al.  Multibarrier tunneling in Ga1−xAlxAs/GaAs heterostructures , 1983 .

[15]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  Time-delay of classical and quantum scattering processes: a conceptual overview and a general definition , 2010, 1010.5329.

[16]  Diederik Aerts The Description of Joint Quantum Entities and the Formulation of a Paradox , 2000 .

[17]  C. Piron,et al.  On the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 1976 .

[18]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox , 2011 .

[19]  Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi,et al.  From Permanence to Total Availability: A Quantum Conceptual Upgrade , 2010, 1010.4942.

[20]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  AN ATTEMPT TO IMAGINE PARTS OF THE REALITY OF THE MICRO-WORLD , 1990 .

[21]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities: A Possible Explanatory Framework for Quantum Theory , 2009, 1004.2530.

[22]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A mechanistic classical laboratory situation violating the Bell inequalities with 2-2 , 1991 .

[23]  Diederik Aerts The stuff the world is made of: physics and reality , 1999 .

[24]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum, classical and intermediate: An illustrative example , 1994 .

[25]  D. Aerts,et al.  Contextual Risk and i ts Relevance in Economics , 2011 .

[26]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The entity and modern physics: the creation-discovery- view of reality 1 , 1998 .

[27]  Dirk Aerts,et al.  A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .

[28]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  The Origin of the Non-Classical Character of the Quantum Probability Model , 1987 .

[29]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1936 .

[30]  Diederik Aerts Quantum structures: An attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature , 1995 .

[31]  C. H. Randall,et al.  Operational Statistics. I. Basic Concepts , 1972 .

[32]  W. Amrein Non-Relativistic Quantum Dynamics , 1981 .

[33]  C. Piron,et al.  Mécanique quantique : bases et applications , 1998 .

[34]  D. Aerts,et al.  The missing elements of reality in the description of quantum mechanics of the E.P.R. paradox situation , 1984 .

[35]  Elena Castellani Interpreting bodies : classical and quantum objects in modern physics , 1998 .

[36]  A. Blaquiere,et al.  Information Complexity and Control in Quantum Physics , 1987 .

[37]  A Representation for Compound Quantum Systems as Individual Entities: Hard Acts of Creation and Hidden Correlations , 1998, quant-ph/0105093.

[38]  Gérard G. Emch,et al.  Mathematical and conceptual foundations of 20th-century physics , 1984 .

[39]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Interpreting Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities , 2010, 1004.2531.

[40]  Diederik Aerts Quantum Mechanics: Structures, Axioms and Paradoxes , 1999 .