Analysis of Suture Manipulation Forces for Teleoperation with Force Feedback

Despite many successes with teleoperated robotic surgical systems, some surgeons feel that the lack of haptic (force or tactile) feedback is detrimental in applications requiring fine suture manipulation. In this paper, we study the difference between applied suture forces in three knot tying exercises: hand ties, instrument ties (using needle drivers), and robot ties (using the da Vinci? Surgical System from Intuitive Surgical, Inc.). Both instrument and robot-assisted ties differ from hand ties in accuracy of applied force. However, only the robot ties differ from hand ties in repeatability of applied force. Furthermore, comparison between attendings and residents revealed statistically significant differences in the forces used during hand ties, although attendings and residents perform similarly when comparing instrument and robot ties to hand ties. These results indicate that resolved force feedback would improve robot-assisted performance during complex surgical tasks such as knot tying with fine suture.

[1]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  M. Mack,et al.  Computer-assisted telemanipulation: an enabling technology for endoscopic coronary artery bypass. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  F. Mohr,et al.  Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  Jack Tigh Dennerlein,et al.  Force-feedback improves performance for steering and combined steering-targeting tasks , 2000, CHI.

[5]  W. Chitwood,et al.  Robotic mitral valve repair: trapezoidal resection and prosthetic annuloplasty with the da vinci surgical system. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Black Falcon: a teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[7]  M Hashizume,et al.  Thoracoscopic thymomectomy with the da Vinci computer-enhanced surgical system. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery-experimental performance evaluation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  U. Kappert,et al.  Closed-chest coronary artery surgery on the beating heart with the use of a robotic system. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Haptic Force-Feedback Devices for the Office Computer: Performance and Musculoskeletal Loading Issues , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[11]  John Relland,et al.  Computer-assisted cardiac surgery , 1999, The Lancet.

[12]  Shahram Payandeh,et al.  Task and Motion Analyses in Endoscopic Surgery , 1996, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[13]  Thomas H. Massie,et al.  The PHANToM Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Objects , 1994 .

[14]  W. Boyd,et al.  Closed-chest coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart with the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  R. Damiano,et al.  Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting-the first steps on a long journey. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  A. Galloway,et al.  Case report of robotic instrument-enhanced mitral valve surgery. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Ralph J. Damiano Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting-the first steps on a long journey. , 2003 .