Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation

Political participation researchers have developed several evaluative techniques to assess the representativeness of political participation patterns. Yet, while the Internet has become a mainstream avenue for political participation in the United States, current assessments of online participation insufficiently apply these methods. To incorporate these methods we begin by drawing upon resource theory to inform two-stage ordered-logit models of online and offline political participation. Our results suggest that the factors predicting online participation often differ from the factors that predict offline participation. Even so, we find that those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds tend to disproportionately possess these distinct online determinants. Next, we use a wide spectrum of political opinion questions to determine whether online participators’ opinions reflect or distort those of the general population. Overall, we find that online participation tends to relate moderately with liberal preferences. However, because offline participation relates to political attitudes similarly, the Internet only marginally advantages the political voice of liberals. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results.

[1]  J. Sargan.  THE ESTIMATION OF ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS USING INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES , 1958 .

[2]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[3]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .

[4]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[5]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[6]  M. Margaret Conway,et al.  Political participation in the United States , 1985 .

[7]  Graham Murdock,et al.  Information Poverty and Political Inequality: Citizenship in the Age of Privatized Communications , 1989 .

[8]  R. Dahl,et al.  Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[9]  D. Resnick,et al.  The Implications of Nonvoting for Democracy in the United States , 1990 .

[10]  R. S. Tedlow.  New And Improved , 1990 .

[11]  Larry M. Bartels.  Instrumental and "Quasi-Instrumental" Variables , 1991 .

[12]  Jan E. Leighley,et al.  The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates , 1992 .

[13]  Michael M. Gant,et al.  Democratic Theory, Nonvoting, and Public Policy , 1993 .

[14]  Benjamin Radcliff.  Turnout and the Democratic Vote , 1994 .

[15]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Arend Lijphart.  Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma , 1996 .

[17]  Arend Lijphart.  Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996 , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  New Media and American Politics , 1998 .

[19]  Bruce Bimber.  The Internet and Citizen Communication With Government: Does the Medium Matter? , 1999 .

[20]  Carol Peters,et al.  Multilingual Information Discovery and AccesS (MIDAS): A Joint ACM DL'99 / ACM SIGIR'99 Workshop , 1999, D Lib Mag..

[21]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Social Access to the Internet , 1999 .

[22]  M. D. Carpini.  Gen.com: Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment , 2000 .

[23]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Troubles With the Internet: The Dynamics of Help at Home , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  R M Groves,et al.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[25]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[26]  Bruce Bimber.  The Study of Information Technology and Civic Engagement , 2000 .

[27]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Media Participation , 2001, New Media Soc..

[28]  Robert D. Atkinson,et al.  Clear Thinking on the Digital Divide , 2001 .

[29]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Communication, Context, and Community , 2001, Commun. Res..

[30]  Frederic I. Solop.  Digital Democracy Comes of Age: Internet Voting and the 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary Election , 2001, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[31]  Brian S. Krueger.  Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States , 2002 .

[32]  Lynn Vavreck,et al.  The Effects of Retail Politics in the New Hampshire Primary , 2002 .

[33]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Constructing the divide: Spatial disparities in broadband access , 2002 .

[34]  R. Lau,et al.  Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections , 2002 .

[35]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Contents , 2003 .

[36]  Lori M. Weber,et al.  Who Participates and Why? , 2003 .

[37]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results , 2003 .

[38]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? , 2003 .

[39]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  A Boost or Bust for Democracy? , 2003 .

[40]  Rob Kling.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, Inf. Soc..