Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and alternative driver genetic alterations in breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification

BackgroundHER2 is overexpressed and amplified in approximately 15% of invasive breast cancers, and is the molecular target and predictive marker of response to anti-HER2 agents. In a subset of these cases, heterogeneous distribution of HER2 gene amplification can be found, which creates clinically challenging scenarios. Currently, breast cancers with HER2 amplification/overexpression in just over 10% of cancer cells are considered HER2-positive for clinical purposes; however, it is unclear as to whether the HER2-negative components of such tumors would be driven by distinct genetic alterations. Here we sought to characterize the pathologic and genetic features of the HER2-positive and HER2-negative components of breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification and to define the repertoire of potential driver genetic alterations in the HER2-negative components of these cases.ResultsWe separately analyzed the HER2-negative and HER2-positive components of 12 HER2 heterogeneous breast cancers using gene copy number profiling and massively parallel sequencing, and identified potential driver genetic alterations restricted to the HER2-negative cells in each case. In vitro experiments provided functional evidence to suggest that BRF2 and DSN1 overexpression/amplification, and the HER2 I767M mutation may be alterations that compensate for the lack of HER2 amplification in the HER2-negative components of HER2 heterogeneous breast cancers.ConclusionsOur results indicate that even driver genetic alterations, such as HER2 gene amplification, can be heterogeneously distributed within a cancer, and that the HER2-negative components are likely driven by genetic alterations not present in the HER2-positive components, including BRF2 and DSN1 amplification and HER2 somatic mutations.

[1]  Christopher W. Wong,et al.  RCP is a human breast cancer-promoting gene with Ras-activating function. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  S. Gruber,et al.  Breast cancer phenotype in women with TP53 germline mutations: a Li-Fraumeni syndrome consortium effort , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[4]  M. Moasser The oncogene HER2: its signaling and transforming functions and its role in human cancer pathogenesis , 2007, Oncogene.

[5]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2/neu expression and its consequences for the management of advanced breast cancer. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  Alan Mackay,et al.  FGFR1 Emerges as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Lobular Breast Carcinomas , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  Daniel Birnbaum,et al.  Prognosis and Gene Expression Profiling of 20q13-Amplified Breast Cancers , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  R. Rodríguez-Barrueco,et al.  Neuregulins and Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[10]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[11]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Immunophenotypic and genomic characterization of papillary carcinomas of the breast , 2012, The Journal of pathology.

[12]  James X. Sun,et al.  Relapsed Classic E-Cadherin (CDH1)–Mutated Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer Shows a High Frequency of HER2 (ERBB2) Gene Mutations , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  F. Markowetz,et al.  The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , 2012, Nature.

[14]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Spatial and temporal diversity in genomic instability processes defines lung cancer evolution , 2014, Science.

[15]  Eunyoung Kang,et al.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: its clinicopathological significance , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[16]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity of HER2/neu in Breast Cancer—A Rare Event , 2007, The breast journal.

[17]  J. M. Lee,et al.  eEF1A2 activates Akt and stimulates Akt-dependent actin remodeling, invasion and migration , 2007, Oncogene.

[18]  Jayanta Debnath,et al.  Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[19]  이연수 Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer , 2011 .

[20]  S. Biggins,et al.  The Mub1/Ubr2 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex Regulates the Conserved Dsn1 Kinetochore Protein , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[21]  F. Bertucci,et al.  Comprehensive Profiling of 8p11-12 Amplification in Breast Cancer , 2005, Molecular Cancer Research.

[22]  Marc K Halushka,et al.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2 gene amplification and protein overexpression in breast cancer. , 2010, Human pathology.

[23]  A. McKenna,et al.  Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  S. Ethier,et al.  Transforming properties of 8p11-12 amplified genes in human breast cancer. , 2010, Cancer research.

[25]  A. Ashworth,et al.  The genomic profile of HER2‐amplified breast cancers: the influence of ER status , 2008, The Journal of pathology.

[26]  Calum MacAulay,et al.  Integrative Genomic Analyses Identify BRF2 as a Novel Lineage-Specific Oncogene in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[27]  C. Swanton Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time. , 2012, Cancer research.

[28]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[29]  Li Ding,et al.  Activating HER2 mutations in HER2 gene amplification negative breast cancer. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[30]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Characterization of the genomic features and expressed fusion genes in micropapillary carcinomas of the breast , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[31]  B. Weigelt,et al.  PIK3CA mutation, but not PTEN loss of function, determines the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to mTOR inhibitory drugs , 2011, Oncogene.

[32]  Wonshik Han,et al.  CAMK1D amplification implicated in epithelial–mesenchymal transition in basal‐like breast cancer , 2008, Molecular oncology.

[33]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Getting it right: designing microarray (and not ‘microawry’) comparative genomic hybridization studies for cancer research , 2007, Laboratory Investigation.

[34]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The Life History of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[35]  Javed Siddiqui,et al.  Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[36]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[37]  N. Turner,et al.  Fibroblast growth factor signalling: from development to cancer , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[38]  A. Ashworth,et al.  DNA amplifications in breast cancer: genotypic-phenotypic correlations. , 2010, Future oncology.

[39]  Yu Cao,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity in localized lung adenocarcinomas delineated by multiregion sequencing , 2014, Science.

[40]  Nicolas Stransky,et al.  Characterization of the recurrent 8p11-12 amplicon identifies PPAPDC1B, a phosphatase protein, as a new therapeutic target in breast cancer. , 2008, Cancer research.

[41]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Epistatic interactions and drug response , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[42]  Li Ding,et al.  Endocrine-therapy-resistant ESR1 variants revealed by genomic characterization of breast-cancer-derived xenografts. , 2013, Cell reports.

[43]  Robert D. Cardiff,et al.  Insights from transgenic mouse models of ERBB2-induced breast cancer , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[44]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  ZNF703 is a common Luminal B breast cancer oncogene that differentially regulates luminal and basal progenitors in human mammary epithelium , 2011, EMBO molecular medicine.

[45]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[46]  Hanna Göransson,et al.  Screening for copy‐number alterations and loss of heterozygosity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia—A comparative study of four differently designed, high resolution microarray platforms , 2008, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[47]  M. Scaltriti,et al.  Biomarkers of drugs targeting HER‐family signalling in cancer , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[48]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Genomic and mutational profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and matched adjacent invasive breast cancers reveals intra‐tumour genetic heterogeneity and clonal selection , 2012, The Journal of pathology.

[49]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity , 2014, Modern Pathology.

[50]  M. Bissell,et al.  FAM83A confers EGFR-TKI resistance in breast cancer cells and in mice. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[51]  J. Troge,et al.  Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing , 2011, Nature.

[52]  J. Troge,et al.  Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity. , 2010, Genome research.

[53]  Simion I. Chiosea,et al.  Hotspot activating PRKD1 somatic mutations in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinomas of the salivary glands , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[54]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[55]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Molecular analysis reveals a genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity of metaplastic breast carcinomas , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[56]  B. Coe,et al.  Resolving the resolution of array CGH. , 2007, Genomics.

[57]  Judith Abrams,et al.  Multiple interacting oncogenes on the 8p11-p12 amplicon in human breast cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[58]  J. Zidan,et al.  Comparison of HER-2 overexpression in primary breast cancer and metastatic sites and its effect on biological targeting therapy of metastatic disease , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[59]  Aleix Prat Aparicio Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2012 .

[60]  Irmtraud M. Meyer,et al.  The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers , 2012, Nature.

[61]  David Chen,et al.  ESR1 ligand binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[62]  T. Hubbard,et al.  A census of human cancer genes , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[63]  N. Navin,et al.  Clonal Evolution in Breast Cancer Revealed by Single Nucleus Genome Sequencing , 2014, Nature.

[64]  Kristian Helin,et al.  Amplification of Mdmx (or Mdm4) Directly Contributes to Tumor Formation by Inhibiting p53 Tumor Suppressor Activity , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[65]  C. Perou,et al.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[66]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.