Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation: Stories of Power, Politics, and Resistance

This paper provides an interpretation of information technology implementation in a relatively unexplored context, that of higher education. In recent years, there has been a call by governments across the world for universities to improve operational efficiency and to reduce duplication of resources by implementing advanced information systems that span the institution and improve processes. Universities in response turned their efforts to implementing complex ERP systems to facilitate the essential cross functional information integration, free internal information flows, and improve the provision and quality of management information. This paper investigates in turn whether enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems present afeasible information system strategy for higher education institutions. Four in-depth case studies were conducted in higher education institutions (HEIs) that were in the process of implementing ERP systems. Numerous complexities, especially in terms of power, politics, and resistance arose in light of the structure of the HEIs.

[1]  D. Dohan,et al.  Using Computers to Analyze Ethnographic Field Data: Theoretical and Practical Considerations , 1998 .

[2]  S. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Will the Internet revolutionize business education and research? Sloan Management Review , 1996 .

[3]  Martin Parker,et al.  The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity , 1995 .

[4]  David Coghlan,et al.  Management Lives: Power and Identity in Work Organizations , 2000 .

[5]  Matthew R. Jones Learning the language of the market: information systems strategy formation in a UK district health authority , 1994 .

[6]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[7]  SabherwalRajiv,et al.  Determinants of commitment to information systems development , 1996 .

[8]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[9]  Chaucer Chaoyun Liang,et al.  Reengineering University Information Services: Yuan Ze University's Experience. , 1998 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[11]  She-I Chang,et al.  A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues , 2000, ICIS.

[12]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[14]  H. Willmott Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the U.K. , 1995 .

[15]  B. Doolin,et al.  Managerialism, information technology and health reform in New Zealand. , 1998, Journal of management in medicine.

[16]  Joanne Gard Marshall,et al.  Plus ça change, plus c'est différent : A report from the KALIPER project on six case studies in LIS education : KALIPER project: Final report , 2001 .

[17]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[18]  Jacqueline C. Vischer,et al.  Strategic Work-Space Planning , 1995 .

[19]  P. Brook Empty Space , 1941, Nature.

[20]  Ben Light,et al.  Beyond Enterprise Resource Planning Projects: Innovative Strategies forCompetitive Advantage , 1999, ECIS.

[21]  M. Newman,et al.  Innovations in Fiefdoms: Developing a Common Student Information System in Six Finnish Universities , 1998 .

[22]  Michael Newman,et al.  The social dynamics of software development , 2000 .

[23]  Thomas Butler,et al.  Enterprise Transformation And The Alignment Of Business And Information Technology Strategies: Lesso , 1998 .

[24]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[25]  Brendan Burchell,et al.  Job Insecurity and Work Intensification: Flexibility and the Changing Boundaries of Work , 1999 .

[26]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[27]  Martin Brigham,et al.  Information Technology and Organizations. Strategies, Networks and Integration , 1998 .

[28]  C. S. Jones,et al.  POWER, POLITICS AND THE JARRATT PROPOSALS FOR ACCOUNTING IN BRITISH UNIVERSITIES , 1991 .

[29]  J. Dearlove,et al.  Fundamental changes in institutional governance structures: the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[30]  Travis Reindl Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education , 2002 .

[31]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  Politics and Organizational Change: The Lived Experience , 1999 .

[32]  Karen C. Fox 1 Information Technology in Higher Education : Evolving Learning Environments , 1998 .

[33]  Michael Newman,et al.  INTEGRATED SYSTEM, AUTONOMOUS DEPARTMENTS: ORGANIZATIONAL INVALIDITY AND SYSTEM CHANGE IN A UNIVERSITY* , 1993 .

[34]  John Milliken Managing Change in Higher Education , 2000 .