Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation

Spatial conservation prioritization concerns the effective allocation of conservation action. Its stages include development of an ecologically based model of conservation value, data pre-processing, spatial prioritization analysis, and interpretation of results for conservation action. Here we investigate the details of each stage for analyses done using the Zonation prioritization framework. While there is much literature about analytical methods implemented in Zonation, there is only scattered information available about what happens before and after the computational analysis. Here we fill this information gap by summarizing the pre-analysis and post-analysis stages of the Zonation framework. Concerning the entire process, we summarize the full workflow and list examples of operational best-case, worst-case, and typical scenarios for each analysis stage. We discuss resources needed in different analysis stages. We also discuss benefits, disadvantages, and risks involved in the application of spatial prioritization from the perspective of different stakeholders. Concerning pre-analysis stages, we explain the development of the ecological model and discuss the setting of priority weights and connectivity responses. We also explain practical aspects of data pre-processing and the post-processing interpretation of results for different conservation objectives. This work facilitates well-informed design and application of Zonation analyses for the purpose of spatial conservation planning. It should be useful for both scientists working on conservation related research as well as for practitioners looking for useful tools for conservation resource allocation. We summarize spatial conservation prioritization analysis workflow using Zonation.We focus on common pre- and post-processing stages of analysis.The utility of several Zonation analysis types are discussed.We summarize operational best-case and worst-case scenarios for analysis stages.This study helps conservation practitioners implement prioritization analyses.

[1]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Novel methods for the design and evaluation of marine protected areas in offshore waters , 2008 .

[2]  Lehtomäki Joona,et al.  ZONATION Framework and Software for Conservation Prioritization , 2013 .

[3]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  The power of information for targeting cost-effective conservation investments in multifunctional farmlands , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  K. Gaston,et al.  Reconciling biodiversity and carbon conservation. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[5]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Reserve Selection Using Nonlinear Species Distribution Models , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Incorporating consumer–resource spatial interactions in reserve design , 2009 .

[7]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  The C-plan conservation planning system: Origins, applications, and possible futures , 2009 .

[8]  Robert L Pressey,et al.  Opportunism, Threats, and the Evolution of Systematic Conservation Planning , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Spatial prioritization of conservation management , 2011 .

[10]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Genetic diversity in widespread species is not congruent with species richness in alpine plant communities. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[11]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[12]  N. Crossman,et al.  Species vulnerability to climate change: impacts on spatial conservation priorities and species representation , 2012 .

[13]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[15]  David B Lindenmayer,et al.  Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK , 2006 .

[18]  E. Tomppo,et al.  Effects of Connectivity and Spatial Resolution of Analyses on Conservation Prioritization across Large Extents , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Planning impact avoidance and biodiversity offsetting using software for spatial conservation prioritisation , 2013, Wildlife Research.

[20]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation , 2009 .

[21]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes , 2009 .

[22]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  An Operational Model for Implementing Conservation Action , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Complementarity-based conservation prioritization using a community classification, and its application to riverine ecosystems , 2010 .

[24]  A. Bennett,et al.  Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  J. Wesley Barnes,et al.  ConsNet: new software for the selection of conservation area networks with spatial and multi‐criteria analyses , 2009 .

[26]  K. Gaston,et al.  Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  The Boundary‐Quality Penalty: a Quantitative Method for Approximating Species Responses to Fragmentation in Reserve Selection , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[28]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies , 2007 .

[29]  Jeffrey R Dunk,et al.  Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2010 .

[30]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  An interoperable decision support tool for conservation planning , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  Aldina M. A. Franco,et al.  Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Aligning Conservation Priorities Across Taxa in Madagascar with High-Resolution Planning Tools , 2008, Science.

[33]  Andre Zerger,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment for linking regional conservation planning and farm-scale actions , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[34]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Use of many low-level conservation targets reduces high-level conservation performance , 2012 .

[35]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Zonation: Spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.0 user manual , 2011 .

[36]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Assessing replacement cost of conservation areas: how does habitat loss influence priorities? , 2009 .

[37]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Setting Conservation Priorities , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A mathematical classification of conservation prioritization problems , 2009 .

[39]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Empirical evidence for reduced protection levels across biodiversity features from target-based conservation planning , 2012 .

[40]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  Colin J. McClean,et al.  Protected areas of Borneo fail to protect forest landscapes with high habitat connectivity , 2011, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[42]  Jane Elith,et al.  Planning for robust reserve networks using uncertainty analysis , 2006 .

[43]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Simulating the effects of using different types of species distribution data in reserve selection , 2008 .

[44]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Biodiversity conservation planning tools , 2006 .

[45]  H. Possingham,et al.  Hitting the target and missing the point: target‐based conservation planning in context , 2009 .

[46]  Jane Elith,et al.  A method for spatial freshwater conservation prioritization , 2008 .

[47]  Rhys E. Green,et al.  Using conservation science to solve conservation problems , 2011 .

[48]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[49]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Administrative regions in conservation: Balancing local priorities with regional to global preferences in spatial planning , 2011 .

[50]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[51]  N. M. J. Crout,et al.  Is my model too complex? Evaluating model formulation using model reduction , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[52]  Sarah J. Converse,et al.  Special Issue Article: Adaptive management for biodiversity conservation in an uncertain world Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program , 2011 .

[53]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Replacement cost: A practical measure of site value for cost-effective reserve planning , 2006 .

[54]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Transparent planning for biodiversity and development in the urban fringe , 2012 .

[55]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[56]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Identification of top priority areas and management landscapes from a national Natura 2000 network , 2013 .

[57]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Defining spatial priorities for capercaillie Tetrao urogallus lekking landscape conservation in south-central Finland , 2012 .

[58]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[59]  S. Andelman,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When , 2007, PLoS biology.

[60]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation , 2011 .

[61]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  R. Foppen,et al.  Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[63]  M. Araújo,et al.  Conservation Planning with Uncertain Climate Change Projections , 2013, PloS one.