This paper documents a mixed-fidelity approach for the design of low-boom supersonic aircraft as a viable approach for designing a pract ical low-boom supersonic configuration. A low-boom configuration that is based on low-fidelit y analysis is used as the baseline. Tail lift is included to help tailor the aft portion of the g round signature. A comparison of low- and high-fidelity analysis results demonstrates the nec essity of using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis in a low-boom supersonic configuration design process. The fuselage shape is modified iteratively to obtain a configuration with a CFD equivalent-area distribution that matches a predetermined low-boom target distribution. The mixed-fidelity approach can easily refine the low-fidelity low-boo m baseline into a low-boom configuration with the use of CFD equivalent-area analysis. The g round signature of the final configuration is calculated by using a state-of-the -art CFD-based boom analysis method that generates accurate midfield pressure distributions for propagation to the ground with ray tracing. The ground signature that is propagated from a midfield pressure distribution has a shaped ramp front, which is similar to the ground s ignature that is propagated from the CFD equivalent-area distribution. This result confi rms the validity of the low-boom supersonic configuration design by matching a low-boom equivalent-area target, which is easier to accomplish than matching a low-boom midfield pressure target.
[1]
Wu Li,et al.
Interactive Inverse Design Optimization of Fuselage Shape for Low-Boom Supersonic Concepts
,
2008
.
[2]
Shahyar Pirzadeh,et al.
Three-dimensional unstructured viscous grids by the advancing-layers method
,
1996
.
[3]
Wu Li,et al.
Generalized Formulation and Extension of Sonic Boom Minimization Theory for Front and Aft Shaping
,
2009
.
[4]
Kenneth Plotkin,et al.
Review of sonic boom theory
,
1989
.
[5]
Paresh Parikh,et al.
The NASA tetrahedral unstructured software system (TetrUSS)
,
2000,
The Aeronautical Journal (1968).
[6]
Karen A. Deere,et al.
Efficient Unstructured Grid Adaptation Methods for Sonic Boom Prediction
,
2008
.
[7]
Wu Li,et al.
Integration of Engine, Plume, and CFD Analyses in Conceptual Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft ∗
,
2009
.