Effect of impeller type and agitation on the performance of pilot scale ASBR and AnSBBR applied to sanitary wastewater treatment.

The objective of this work was to assess the effect of agitation rate and impeller type in two mechanically stirred sequencing batch reactors: one containing granulated biomass (denominated ASBR) and the other immobilized biomass on polyurethane foam (denominated AnSBBR). Each configuration, with total volume of 1 m(3), treated 0.65 m(3) sanitary wastewater at ambient temperature in 8-h cycles. Three impeller types were assessed for each reactor configuration: flat-blade turbine impeller, 45 degrees -inclined-blade turbine impeller and helix impeller, as well as two agitation rates: 40 and 80 rpm, resulting in a combination of six experimental conditions. In addition, the ASBR was also operated at 20 rpm with a flat-blade turbine impeller and the AnSBBR was operated with a draft tube and helix impeller at 80 and 120 rpm. To quantify how impeller type and agitation rate relate to substrate consumption rate, results obtained during monitoring at the end of the cycle, as well as the time profiles during a cycle were analyzed. Increasing agitation rate from 40 rpm to 80 rpm in the AnSBBR improved substrate consumption rate whereas in the ASBR this increase destabilized the system, likely due to granule rupture caused by the higher agitation. The AnSBBR showed highest solids and substrate removal, highest kinetic constant and highest alkalinity production when using a helix impeller, 80 rpm, and no draft tube. The best condition for the ASBR was achieved with a flat-blade turbine impeller at 20 rpm. The presence of the draft tube in the AnSBBR did not show significant improvement in reactor efficiency. Furthermore, power consumption studies in these pilot scale reactors showed that power transfer required to improve mass transfer might be technically and economically feasible.

[2]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[3]  H. J. Cumba,et al.  Optimization of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors treating dilute swine slurries , 2005 .

[4]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Feasibility of treating partially soluble wastewater in anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (ASBBR) with mechanical stirring. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[5]  P. N. Sarma,et al.  Influence of recirculation on the performance of anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR) treating hypersaline composite chemical wastewater. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[6]  R. R. Dague,et al.  Laboratory studies on the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor , 1995 .

[8]  M. Zaiat,et al.  AnSBBR applied to the treatment of wastewater from a personal care industry: effect of organic load and fill time. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[10]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Influence of agitation rate on the performance of a stirred anaerobic sequencing batch reactor containing immobilized biomass. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Feasibility of nitrification/denitrification in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor with liquid circulation applied to post-treatment. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Aoyi Ochieng,et al.  Homogenization energy in a stirred tank , 2008 .

[13]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  CFD simulation of liquid-phase mixing in solid–liquid stirred reactor , 2008 .

[14]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Fluidized ASBR treating synthetic wastewater: Effect of recirculation velocity , 2008 .

[15]  George Tchobanoglous,et al.  Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse ( Fourth Edition ) , 2011 .

[16]  D. Cașcaval,et al.  Modeling of mixing in stirred bioreactors , 2002 .

[17]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treatment of landfill leachate , 1999 .

[18]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor applied to automobile industry wastewater treatment: Volumetric loading rate and feed strategy effects , 2008 .

[19]  P. N. Sarma,et al.  Bioaugmentation of an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR) with immobilized sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) for the treatment of sulphate bearing chemical wastewater. , 2005 .

[20]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Influence of agitation rate on the performance of an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor containing granulated biomass treating low-strength wastewater , 2003 .

[21]  Luís F. Melo,et al.  Feasibility of a pulsed sequencing batch reactor with anaerobic aggregated biomass for the treatment of low strength wastewaters , 1997 .

[22]  Marcelo Zaiat,et al.  Anaerobic whey treatment by a stirred sequencing batch reactor (ASBR): effects of organic loading and supplemented alkalinity. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Effect of ammonia load on efficiency of nitrogen removal in an SBBR with liquid-phase circulation , 2008 .

[24]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Effect of impeller type and mechanical agitation on the mass transfer and power consumption aspects of ASBR operation treating synthetic wastewater. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  Mixing in large-scale vessels stirred with multiple radial or radial and axial up-pumping impellers: modelling and measurements , 2000 .

[26]  L. Fernandes,et al.  Dynamic modelling of substrate degradation in sequencing batch anaerobic reactors (SBAR) , 1993 .

[27]  Marcelo Zaiat,et al.  Effects of feeding time and organic loading in an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (ASBBR) treating diluted whey. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  R. Zadghaffari,et al.  A mixing study in a double-Rushton stirred tank , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..