Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank.

INTRODUCTION Biosamples and associated clinical data accelerate translational and clinical research discoveries. A lack of high quality biosamples both stalls projects and limits research advances. In this study, we targeted a wide audience of University of California (UC) biobanking stakeholders who were either involved with the collection or the utilization of biosamples to assess the scope of their biobanking activities and their interest in virtual biobanking or cooperating in the formation of the UC-wide biorepository. MATERIALS AND METHODS Each institutional review board from the five UC medical campuses' provided a dataset of potential researchers involved with biobanking. Once identified, a brief six item web-based questionnaire was administered electronically to these researchers. RESULTS Most survey participants (80%) responded "yes" (n = 348) that they were actively collecting biosamples for research, and 68% of participants indicated they would either definitely (30%, n = 131) or maybe (38%, n = 166) request biosample materials now or within the next year. An equal proportion of participants responded yes (42% or n = 184) and maybe (42% or n = 182) when asked if they would voluntarily contribute specimens to a UC-wide virtual biobank. DISCUSSION The results presented above show high levels of support among UC biobanking stakeholders for both requesting material from and contributing material to a UC-wide virtual biobank. In addition, a considerable number of individual researchers on our five UC medical campuses are conducting biospecimen research (i.e., well over n = 435 respondents).

[1]  G. Henderson,et al.  Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey , 2013, Genome Medicine.

[2]  Catherine Waldby,et al.  National Biobanks: Clinical Labor, Risk Production, and the Creation of Biovalue , 2010, Science, technology & human values.

[3]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Bringing the Common Rule into the 21st Century. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R QuinlanPhilip,et al.  A data standard for sourcing fit-for-purpose biological samples in an integrated virtual network of biobanks. , 2014 .

[5]  C. Critchley,et al.  Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[6]  G. Henderson,et al.  Stewardship Practices of U.S. Biobanks , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[7]  E. Gaffney,et al.  Development and progress of Ireland's biobank network: Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI), standardized documentation, sample and data release, and international perspective. , 2013, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[8]  A. Broeks,et al.  Optimizing sharing of hospital biobank samples , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[9]  J. Greenspan,et al.  Biobanking past, present and future: responsibilities and benefits. , 2013, AIDS.

[10]  Jim Vaught,et al.  A review of international biobanks and networks: success factors and key benchmarks. , 2009, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[11]  John S. Luque,et al.  Development and Validation of the Biobanking Attitudes and Knowledge Survey (BANKS) , 2014, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  H. Greely,et al.  Informational risk, institutional review, and autonomy in the proposed changes to the common rule. , 2012, IRB.

[13]  S. Cargill.  Biobanking and the Abandonment of Informed Consent: An Ethical Imperative , 2016 .

[14]  Gerd Schmitz,et al.  The Danubian Biobank project. , 2008, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  Ezekiel J Emanuel,et al.  Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Bok-Ghee Han,et al.  Current Status, Challenges, Policies, and Bioethics of Biobanks , 2013, Genomics & informatics.

[17]  S. Fullerton,et al.  Has the biobank bubble burst? Withstanding the challenges for sustainable biobanking in the digital era , 2016, BMC Medical Ethics.

[18]  S. Somiari,et al.  The Future of Biobanking: A Conceptual Look at How Biobanks Can Respond to the Growing Human Biospecimen Needs of Researchers. , 2015, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.