The boundary model: A geographical analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves

Abstract It is widely recognised that nearly all parks and reserves are too small to protect their biological diversity. In response to this problem, we have been developing a multidisciplinary ‘boundary model’ that focuses upon the processes of exchange across the administrative edges of nature reserves. The model incorporates known dynamics from various disciplines and describes the interactions of these forces across the boundary. These disciplines include biogeography, ecology, and human effects, influences and attitudes in an understanding of reserve boundary vulnerability and effectiveness. The boundary model recognises the development of edges in association with the establishment of the administrative boundary. However, it discerns between ‘natural’ and ‘generated’ edges that are based upon the differing stimuli for their development and change. Segmentation of the boundary is recognised as a manifestation of environmental heterogeneity. The boundary model suggests that exposure of the reserve is a major determinate of potential vulnerability. Effectiveness of reserve protection is hypothesised to be more dependent upon what crosses the boundary than upon any internal processes alone.

[1]  C. Margules,et al.  Modern biogeographic theory: Are there any lessons for nature reserve design? , 1982 .

[2]  N. Myers The Sinking Ark: A New Look at the Problem of Disappearing Species , 1979 .

[3]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Studies in outdoor recreation , 1986 .

[4]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species , 1981 .

[5]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Refuge Design and Island Biogeographic Theory: Effects of Fragmentation , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Terborgh Preservation of Natural Diversity: The Problem of Extinction Prone Species , 1974 .

[7]  W. Newmark,et al.  Legal and biotic boundaries of western North American national parks: A problem of congruence , 1985 .

[8]  N. Gotelli,et al.  Island biogeographic theory and conservation practice: Species-area or specious-area relationships? , 1984 .

[9]  R. Forman,et al.  Landscape Modification and Changing Ecological Characteristics , 1983 .

[10]  J. Stamps,et al.  The Territorial Defense Hypothesis and the Ecology of Insular Vertebrates , 1985, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  R. Forman,et al.  Corridors in a landscape their ecological structure and function , 1983 .

[12]  Carolyn Harrison,et al.  The Archipelago Approach to Conservation: Inspiring but Unproven@@@The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. , 1984 .

[13]  R. Forman,et al.  Patches and Structural Components for A Landscape Ecology , 1981 .

[14]  M. Shaffer Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[15]  J. Diamond,et al.  Subdivision of nature reserves and the maintenance of species diversity , 1980, Nature.

[16]  Daniel H. Janzen,et al.  No Park Is an Island: Increase in Interference from Outside as Park Size Decreases , 1983 .

[17]  J. Diamond,et al.  Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations. , 1976, Science.

[18]  The State of the World's Parks , 2019 .

[19]  J. Karr Avian Extinction on Barro Colorado Island, Panama: A Reassessment , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  THE ISLAND DILEMMA: LESSONS OF MODERN BIOGEOGRAPHIC STUDIES FOR THE DESIGN OF NATURAL RESERVES , 1975 .