Catheter-associated bloodstream infections and thrombotic risk in hematologic patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC)

PurposeThe use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) as an alternative to other central venous access devices (CVAD) is becoming very frequent in cancer patients. To evaluate the impact of complications associated to these devices in patients with hematologic malignancies, we revised the catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and the catheter-related thrombotic complications (CRTC) observed at our institute between January 2009 and December 2012.MethodsA total of 612 PICCs were inserted into 483 patients at diagnosis or in subsequent phases of their hematologic disease. PICCs were successfully inserted in all cases. The median duration of in situ PICC placement was 101 days (interquartile range, 48–184 days).ResultsA CRBSI occurred in 47 cases (7.7 %), with a rate of 0.59 per 1000 PICC days. A CRTC was recorded in 16 cases (2.6 %), with a rate of 0.20 per 1000 PICC days. No serious complication was associated to these events. Cox regression analyses of variables associated to CRBSIs and to CRTCs showed that only the type of disease (acute leukemia compared to other diseases) was significantly associated to a higher incidence of CRBSIs, while no feature was predictive for a higher risk of CRTCs.ConclusionsPICCs represent a useful and safe alternative to conventional CVAD for the management of patients with hematologic malignancies.

[1]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[2]  I. Lossos,et al.  Vascular Access via Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters (PICCs): Experience in 40 Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia at a Single Institute , 2001, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[3]  B. Salzberger,et al.  Outcomes of Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in Adult Neutropenic Patients: A Prospective Cohort and Matched Case-Control Study , 2003, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[4]  J. Seymour,et al.  Infective and thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: prospective evaluation of nontunneled devices , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[5]  P. Chiusolo,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the management of oncohematological patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation , 2013, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[6]  S. Murphy,et al.  A Theory‐based Intervention to Improve Nurses' Knowledge, Self‐efficacy, and Skills to Reduce PICC Occlusion , 2005, Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

[7]  O. Stenqvist,et al.  Material Thrombogenicity in Central Venous Catheterization II. A Comparison between Plain Silicone Elastomer, and Plain Polyethylene, Long, Antebrachial Catheters , 1983, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  C. Tai,et al.  A Retrospective Study on the Long-term Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and the Importance of Nursing Care and Education , 2011, Cancer nursing.

[9]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  Marcus Ferrone,et al.  Risk of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection With Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters Used in Hospitalized Patients , 2006 .

[11]  Xin-en Huang,et al.  Comparison of complications of peripherally inserted central catheters with ultrasound guidance or conventional methods in cancer patients. , 2012, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[12]  P. Chevallier,et al.  Utilisation des cathéters centraux insérés par voie périphérique (PICC) en oncohématologie , 2010 .

[13]  G. Lambertenghi-Deliliers,et al.  Central Venous Catheter-related Complications in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors and Prophylactic Measures , 2003, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[14]  H. Batirel,et al.  Complications and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports , 2004, The journal of vascular access.

[15]  F. Mandelli,et al.  Early and Late Complications Related to Central Venous Catheters in Hematological Malignancies: a Retrospective Analysis of 1102 Patients , 2014, Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases.

[16]  F. Lynch,et al.  Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[17]  J. Polak,et al.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  H. Hansson,et al.  Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: a comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. , 1984, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[19]  V. Chopra,et al.  Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, The Lancet.

[20]  Mark Jones,et al.  Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: A prospective cohort study , 2009 .