Computing stationary free-surface shapes in microfluidics

A finite-element algorithm for computing free-surface flows driven by arbitrary body forces is presented. The algorithm is primarily designed for the microfluidic parameter range where (i) the Reynolds number is small and (ii) force-driven pressure and flow fields compete with the surface tension for the shape of a stationary free surface. The free surface shape is represented by the boundaries of finite elements that move according to the stress applied by the adjacent fluid. Additionally, the surface tends to minimize its free energy and by that adapts its curvature to balance the normal stress at the surface. The numerical approach consists of the iteration of two alternating steps: The solution of a fluidic problem in a prescribed domain with slip boundary conditions at the free surface and a consecutive update of the domain driven by the previously determined pressure and velocity fields. For a Stokes problem the first step is linear, whereas the second step involves the nonlinear free-surface boundary condition. This algorithm is justified both by physical and mathematical arguments. It is tested in two dimensions for two cases that can be solved analytically. The magnitude of the errors is discussed in dependence on the approximation order of the finite elements and on a step-width parameter of the algorithm. Moreover, the algorithm is shown to be robust in the sense that convergence is reached also from initial forms that strongly deviate from the final shape. The presented algorithm does not require a remeshing of the used grid at the boundary. This advantage is achieved by a built-in mechanism that causes a smooth change from the behavior of a free surface to that of a rubber blanket if the boundary mesh becomes irregular. As a side effect, the element sides building up the free surface in two dimensions all approach equal lengths. The presented variational derivation of the boundary condition corroborates the numerical finding that a second-order approximation of the velocity also necessitates a second-order approximation for the free surface discretization.A finite-element algorithm for computing free-surface flows driven by arbitrary body forces is presented. The algorithm is primarily designed for the microfluidic parameter range where (i) the Reynolds number is small and (ii) force-driven pressure and flow fields compete with the surface tension for the shape of a stationary free surface. The free surface shape is represented by the boundaries of finite elements that move according to the stress applied by the adjacent fluid. Additionally, the surface tends to minimize its free energy and by that adapts its curvature to balance the normal stress at the surface. The numerical approach consists of the iteration of two alternating steps: The solution of a fluidic problem in a prescribed domain with slip boundary conditions at the free surface and a consecutive update of the domain driven by the previously determined pressure and velocity fields. For a Stokes problem the first step is linear, whereas the second step involves the nonlinear free-surface bounda...

[1]  Achim Wixforth,et al.  Acoustic manipulation of small droplets , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[2]  L. Scriven,et al.  Dynamics of a fluid interface Equation of motion for Newtonian surface fluids , 1960 .

[3]  V. Cristini,et al.  Theory and numerical simulation of droplet dynamics in complex flows--a review. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Peter Hänggi,et al.  Chiral separation in microflows. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[5]  Udo Seifert,et al.  Configurations of fluid membranes and vesicles , 1997 .

[6]  P. Fischer,et al.  High-Order Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flow , 2002 .

[7]  Stéphane Popinet,et al.  A front-tracking algorithm for accurate representation of surface tension , 1999 .

[8]  S. Zaleski,et al.  Modelling Merging and Fragmentation in Multiphase Flows with SURFER , 1994 .

[9]  U. Thiele Open questions and promising new fields in dewetting , 2003, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[10]  Mark A. Hayes,et al.  Peer Reviewed: Microfluidics: Controlling Fluids in Small Places , 2001 .

[11]  M. Hayes,et al.  Microfluidics: controlling fluids in small places. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  B. Finlayson The method of weighted residuals and variational principles : with application in fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer , 1972 .

[13]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale , 2005 .

[14]  Howard A. Stone,et al.  ENGINEERING FLOWS IN SMALL DEVICES , 2004 .

[15]  M. Renardy,et al.  PROST: a parabolic reconstruction of surface tension for the volume-of-fluid method , 2002 .

[16]  Alexander Z. Zinchenko,et al.  A novel boundary-integral algorithm for viscous interaction of deformable drops , 1997 .

[17]  Kenneth A. Brakke,et al.  The Surface Evolver , 1992, Exp. Math..

[18]  Wesley Le Mars Nyborg,et al.  11 - Acoustic Streaming , 1965 .

[19]  Kunibert G. Siebert,et al.  W1∞-convergence of the discrete free boundary for obstacle problems , 2000 .

[20]  P. A. Sackinger,et al.  A finite element method for free surface flows of incompressible fluids in three dimensions. Part I. Boundary fitted mesh motion , 2000 .

[21]  Michael Renardy,et al.  Imposing no Boundary Condition at Outflow: why does it Work? , 1997 .

[22]  K. A. Semendyayev,et al.  Handbook of mathematics , 1985 .

[23]  M. Behr On the application of slip boundary condition on curved boundaries , 2004 .

[24]  C. Cuvelier,et al.  Some Numerical Methods for the Computation of Capillary Free Boundaries Governed by the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1987, SIAM Rev..

[25]  Achim Wixforth,et al.  Carbon nanotube alignment by surface acoustic waves , 2004 .

[26]  C. Pozrikidis,et al.  Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow: Green's functions , 1992 .

[27]  Achim Wixforth,et al.  Acoustic mixing at low Reynold's numbers , 2006 .

[28]  H. Morgan,et al.  Ac electrokinetics: a review of forces in microelectrode structures , 1998 .

[29]  A. Smolianski Finite‐element/level‐set/operator‐splitting (FELSOS) approach for computing two‐fluid unsteady flows with free moving interfaces , 2005 .

[30]  P. Raviart Finite element methods and Navier-Stokes equations , 1979 .

[31]  J. Guven Membrane geometry with auxiliary variables and quadratic constraints , 2004, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General.

[32]  L. E. Scriven,et al.  Study of coating flow by the finite element method , 1981 .

[33]  J. Brackbill,et al.  A continuum method for modeling surface tension , 1992 .

[34]  G. Dziuk,et al.  An algorithm for evolutionary surfaces , 1990 .

[35]  J. R. A. Pearson,et al.  Computational Analysis of Polymer Processing , 1983 .

[36]  Mark C. T. Wilson,et al.  On the calculation of normals in free‐surface flow problems , 2004 .

[37]  Z Guttenberg,et al.  Flow profiling of a surface-acoustic-wave nanopump. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[39]  R. Aris Vectors, Tensors and the Basic Equations of Fluid Mechanics , 1962 .

[40]  D. Figeys,et al.  Lab-on-a-chip: a revolution in biological and medical sciences , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[41]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  On the contravariant form of the Navier-Stokes equations in time-dependent curvilinear coordinate systems , 2004 .

[42]  Jemal Guven,et al.  Deformations of the geometry of lipid vesicles , 2002 .

[43]  Peter K. Jimack,et al.  Finite Element Simulation of Three-Dimensional Free-Surface Flow Problems , 2005, J. Sci. Comput..

[44]  A. Wixforth,et al.  Planar chip device for PCR and hybridization with surface acoustic wave pump. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[45]  N. Riley Acoustic Streaming , 1998 .