National Numeracy Tests: A Graphic Tells a Thousand Words

Mandatory numeracy tests have become commonplace in many countries, heralding a new era in school assessment. New forms of accountability and an increased emphasis on national and international standards (and benchmarks) have the potential to reshape mathematics curricula. It is noteworthy that the mathematics items used in these tests are rich in graphics. Many of the items, for example, require students to have an understanding of information graphics (for example, maps, charts and graphs) in order to solve the tasks. This investigation classifies mathematics items in Australia's inaugural national numeracy tests and considers the effect such standardised testing will have on practice. It is argued that the design of mathematics items is more likely to be a reliable indication of student performance if graphical, linguistic and contextual components are considered both in isolation and in integrated ways as essential elements of task design.

[1]  R G McGee,et al.  A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[2]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  Solving Graphics Problems: Student Performance in Junior Grades , 2007 .

[3]  Beth A. Harn,et al.  Promoting beginning reading success through meaningful assessment of early literacy skills , 2006 .

[4]  Judith Good,et al.  Learning to Think and Communicate with Diagrams: 14 Questions to Consider , 2001, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[5]  Priti Shah,et al.  A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .

[6]  J. Boaler.  When Do Girls Prefer Football to Fashion? An analysis of female underachievement in relation to ‘realistic’ mathematic contexts , 1994 .

[7]  Michael Russell,et al.  Perceived Effects of State-Mandated Testing Programs on Teaching and Learning: Findings from a National Survey of Teachers. , 2003 .

[8]  Carmel M. Diezmann.  Graphics and the National Numeracy Tests , 2008 .

[9]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  Essential Differences between High and Low Performers' Thinking about Graphically-Orientated Numeracy Items , 2007 .

[10]  Linda M. Mcneil.  Resource Review : Contradictions of School Reform: Educational Costs of Standardized Testing , 2001 .

[11]  Brett D. Jones,et al.  Learning to Take Tests or Learning for Understanding? Teachers' Beliefs about Test-Based Accountability , 2007 .

[12]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[13]  Robyn Levenia Zevenbergen,et al.  Reconceptualising numeracy for New Times , 2004 .

[14]  J. Kirby,et al.  Chapter 4 Comprehending and Using Maps: Are there Two Modes of Map Processing? , 1994 .

[15]  Brian M. Stecher,et al.  Unintended Consequences of Test-Based Accountability When Testing in "Milepost" Grades , 2001 .

[16]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  The role of information graphics in mathematical proficiency , 2008 .

[17]  Jane Watson,et al.  Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice. Volumes 1 and 2. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. , 2007 .

[18]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  An instrument for assessing primary students’ knowledge of information graphics in mathematics , 2009 .

[19]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[20]  Patricia Broadfoot,et al.  Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice , 1995 .

[21]  J. Pozo,et al.  On the Road to Graphicacy: The learning of graphical representation systems , 2004 .

[22]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Reading graphs: Contributions to an integrative concept of literacy , 2002 .

[23]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[24]  Robyn Jorgensen.  Reconceptualising numeracy for New Times , 2004 .

[25]  Jane Greenlees,et al.  Standardised assessment in mathematics: The tale of two items , 2008 .

[26]  Daniel R. Hittleman.  A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words...If You Know the Words. , 1985 .

[27]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[28]  Stephen Michael Kosslyn,et al.  Graph Design for the Eye and Mind , 2006 .

[29]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  Fourth Grade Students' Performance on Graphical Languages in Mathematics , 2005 .

[30]  P. Shah,et al.  Review of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction , 2002 .

[31]  T. Adams,et al.  Reading Mathematics: More Than Words Can Say. , 2003 .

[32]  J. Hattie.  What is the nature of evidence that makes a difference to learning , 2013 .

[33]  G. Goldin.  Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics , 1998 .

[34]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information , 1986, TOGS.

[35]  Gerald Kulm,et al.  Alignment of Content and Effectiveness of Mathematics Assessment Items , 2005 .