Protein Molecular Surface Mapped at Different Geometrical Resolutions

Many areas of biochemistry and molecular biology, both fundamental and applications-orientated, require an accurate construction, representation and understanding of the protein molecular surface and its interaction with other, usually small, molecules. There are however many situations when the protein molecular surface gets in physical contact with larger objects, either biological, such as membranes, or artificial, such as nanoparticles. The contribution presents a methodology for describing and quantifying the molecular properties of proteins, by geometrical and physico-chemical mapping of the molecular surfaces, with several analytical relationships being proposed for molecular surface properties. The relevance of the molecular surface-derived properties has been demonstrated through the calculation of the statistical strength of the prediction of protein adsorption. It is expected that the extension of this methodology to other phenomena involving proteins near solid surfaces, in particular the protein interaction with nanoparticles, will result in important benefits in the understanding and design of protein-specific solid surfaces.

[1]  J. Kavanaugh,et al.  High-resolution crystal structures of human hemoglobin with mutations at tryptophan 37beta: structural basis for a high-affinity T-state,. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[2]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Microbeads on microposts: an inverted architecture for bead microarrays. , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 2. Combinatorial organic synthesis, library screening strategies, and future directions. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Sara Linse,et al.  Understanding the nanoparticle–protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Flexible protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  D. Nicolau,et al.  The BAD project: data mining, database and prediction of protein adsorption on surfaces. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[7]  Akira R. Kinjo,et al.  Recoverable one-dimensional encoding of three-dimensional protein structures , 2005, Bioinform..

[8]  David Farrar,et al.  Interpretation of protein adsorption: surface-induced conformational changes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  K Henrick,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions , 2022 .

[10]  Paul Yager,et al.  A method for characterizing adsorption of flowing solutes to microfluidic device surfaces. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[11]  David Farrar,et al.  Surface tailoring for controlled protein adsorption: effect of topography at the nanometer scale and chemistry. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Deok-Soo Kim,et al.  Molecular surfaces on proteins via beta shapes , 2007, Comput. Aided Des..

[13]  Robert Langer,et al.  Advances in Biomaterials, Drug Delivery, and Bionanotechnology , 2003 .

[14]  Iseult Lynch,et al.  Protein-nanoparticle interactions: What does the cell see? , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[15]  K. D. Gibson,et al.  Surface area of the intersection of three spheres with unequal radii A simplified analytical formula , 1988 .

[16]  Stephen H. White,et al.  Experimentally determined hydrophobicity scale for proteins at membrane interfaces , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[17]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Teruo Okano,et al.  Temperature-responsive intelligent interfaces for biomolecular separation and cell sheet engineering , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  The three-dimensional dynamics of actin waves, a model of cytoskeletal self-organization. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Cyrus Levinthal,et al.  A vectorized algorithm for calculating the accessible surface area of macromolecules , 1991 .

[21]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[22]  Kenneth M. Merz,et al.  Rapid approximation to molecular surface area via the use of Boolean logic and look‐up tables , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  G. Higgins,et al.  Amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles and neuronal loss in brains of transgenic mice overexpressing a C-terminal fragment of human amyloid precursor protein , 1991, Nature.

[24]  P. Biswas,et al.  Hydrophobic moments, shape, and packing in disordered proteins. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[25]  Michael L. Connolly,et al.  Molecular surface Triangulation , 1985 .

[26]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Molecular recognition via face center representation of a molecular surface. , 1996, Journal of Molecular Graphics.

[27]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Jonathan P. Wright,et al.  Surface hydrophobicity modulates the operation of actomyosin-based dynamic nanodevices. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[29]  J. Kavanaugh,et al.  Crystallographic evidence for a new ensemble of ligand-induced allosteric transitions in hemoglobin: the T-to-T(high) quaternary transitions. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[30]  Santosh Putta,et al.  Shapes of things: computer modeling of molecular shape in drug discovery. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Frank Eisenhaber,et al.  Improved strategy in analytic surface calculation for molecular systems: Handling of singularities and computational efficiency , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  Volkhard Helms,et al.  What induces pocket openings on protein surface patches involved in protein–protein interactions? , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[33]  Bengt Herbert Kasemo,et al.  Biological surface science , 1998 .

[34]  Chris Sander,et al.  The double cubic lattice method: Efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[35]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Microfabricated magnetic bead polydimethylsiloxane microarrays , 2010 .

[36]  R. Mukhopadhyay Devices to drool for. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  Morteza Mahmoudi,et al.  Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions , 2013 .

[38]  Randy J. Zauhar,et al.  Computing the electric potential of biomolecules: Application of a new method of molecular surface triangulation , 1990 .

[39]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[40]  Deok-Soo Kim,et al.  Recognition of docking sites on a protein using beta-shape based on Voronoi diagram of atoms , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[41]  R. Mukhopadhyay What does nanofluidics have to offer? , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[42]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Complementary vasoactivity and matrix remodelling in arterial adaptations to altered flow and pressure , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[43]  S. Radford,et al.  Protein folding mechanisms: new methods and emerging ideas. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[44]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  Nanotoxicology: nanoparticles reconstruct lipids. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[45]  Y. Yamagata,et al.  Contribution of polar groups in the interior of a protein to the conformational stability. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[46]  K. Nishikawa,et al.  Predicting absolute contact numbers of native protein structure from amino acid sequence , 2004, Proteins.

[47]  F. Richards The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  Yuan-Fang Wang,et al.  Efficient molecular surface generation using level-set methods. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[49]  B Honig,et al.  Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. , 1991, Science.

[50]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1992, VVS.

[51]  Indira Ghosh,et al.  Fractal symmetry of protein interior: what have we learned? , 2011, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[52]  M. Sanner,et al.  Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[53]  Iseult Lynch,et al.  What the cell "sees" in bionanoscience. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[54]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Separation-free detection of biological molecules based on plasmon-enhanced fluorescence. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[55]  A. Banerji,et al.  A new computational model to study mass inhomogeneity and hydrophobicity inhomogeneity in proteins , 2009, European Biophysics Journal.

[56]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Molecular shape comparisons in searches for active sites and functional similarity. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[57]  Deok-Soo Kim,et al.  Pocket extraction on proteins via the Voronoi diagram of spheres. , 2008, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[58]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[59]  C. Chothia,et al.  The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[60]  Liangfang Zhang,et al.  Nanoparticle-induced surface reconstruction of phospholipid membranes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  M. L. Connolly Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[62]  K. Dawson,et al.  Inhibition of IAPP and IAPP(20-29) fibrillation by polymeric nanoparticles. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[63]  H. Erickson Size and Shape of Protein Molecules at the Nanometer Level Determined by Sedimentation, Gel Filtration, and Electron Microscopy , 2009, Biological Procedures Online.

[64]  Protein Surface Functional Imaging , 2012 .

[65]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Line and two-dimensional fractal analysis of micrographs obtained by atomic force microscopy of surface-immobilized oligonucleotide nano-aggregates , 2005 .

[66]  R. Zahler Enzyme Structure and Mechanism , 1979, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[67]  I. Ghosh,et al.  Revisiting the Myths of Protein Interior: Studying Proteins with Mass-Fractal Hydrophobicity-Fractal and Polarizability-Fractal Dimensions , 2009, PloS one.

[68]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[69]  Glen Eugene Kellogg,et al.  HINT: A new method of empirical hydrophobic field calculation for CoMFA , 1991, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[70]  M. Toner,et al.  Microengineering of cellular interactions. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[71]  Dan V. Nicolau,et al.  Identifying Optimal Lipid Raft Characteristics Required To Promote Nanoscale Protein-Protein Interactions on the Plasma Membrane , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[72]  A Caflisch,et al.  Hydrophobicity at the surface of proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[73]  Doros N. Theodorou,et al.  Analytical treatment of the volume and surface area of molecules formed by an arbitrary collection of unequal spheres intersected by planes , 1991 .