Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row CT: influence of heart rate and measurement methods on interacquisition variability initial experience.

PURPOSE To assess the effect of heart rate on interacquisition variability in different coronary calcium quantification methods at multi-detector row computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty consecutive adults (39 men and 11 women; mean age, 57 years +/- 13 [SD]) with various heart rates were examined with two prospectively electrocardiographically triggered multi-detector row CT acquisitions in succession for detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification. Calcium score, volume, and mass were measured for each acquisition. Interacquisition variability was evaluated in association with heart rate and quantification method in subjects and individual coronary vessels by using t tests and analysis of variance. RESULTS In 37 subjects with detected calcium, interacquisition variability in mass measurement (10.4%) was significantly lower than that in score (23.9%) and volume (15.7%) measurements (P <.02). The interacquisition variability in all quantification methods was well correlated with heart rate and was considerably greater when heart rates were higher than 70 beats per minute (bpm) than when heart rates were 70 bpm or lower (P <.002). There was a clear tendency for interacquisition variability to vary by vessel (P <.01). The correlation of interacquisition variability with heart rate and a significant difference in interacquisition variability between the group with heart rates of 70 bpm or lower and the group with rates higher than 70 bpm (P <.02) were found for the left main and left anterior descending arteries but not for the circumflex and right coronary arteries. CONCLUSION Interacquisition variability in coronary calcium measurements at multi-detector row CT is significantly less at lower heart rates. The coronary calcium mass measurement is more reproducible than are score and volume measurements.

[1]  M. Budoff,et al.  Effect of electrocardiogram triggering on reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  T. Callister,et al.  Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  H. Mabuchi,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcification using ultrafast computed tomography: Reproducibility of measurements , 1993, Coronary artery disease.

[4]  M. Budoff,et al.  Coronary Artery Motion During the Cardiac Cycle and Optimal ECG Triggering for Coronary Artery Imaging , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[5]  M F Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  B. Ohnesorge,et al.  Heart Rate Adaptive Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Electrocardiogram-Gated Multislice Spiral CT of the Heart , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  D. Rader,et al.  Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[9]  C H McCollough,et al.  Electron-beam CT: use of a calibration phantom to reduce variability in calcium quantitation. , 1995, Radiology.

[10]  Y. Arad,et al.  Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. , 1996, Circulation.

[11]  D. Goff,et al.  Evaluation of subsecond gated helical CT for quantification of coronary artery calcium and comparison with electron beam CT. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  A Crispin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  H Anno,et al.  Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[14]  S. Rich,et al.  Reproducibility of the measurement of coronary calcium with ultrafast computed tomography. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  W Moshage,et al.  In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[16]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[17]  J G Goldin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[18]  T. Callister,et al.  Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  M. Reiser,et al.  Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  C. Becker,et al.  Visualization and quantification of coronary calcifications with electron beam and spiral computed tomography , 2000, European Radiology.

[21]  R. Detrano,et al.  Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. , 1996, American heart journal.

[22]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1996, Circulation.

[23]  C. Leier,et al.  Changes in Diastolic Time with Various Pharmacologic Agents: Implication for Myocardial Perfusion , 1979, Circulation.

[24]  M. Reiser,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. , 2002, Radiology.