Partially Separated Meta-models with Evolution Strategies for Well Placement Optimization

Finding the optimal location of non-conventional wells increases significantly the project's Net Present Value (NPV). This problem is nowadays one of the most challenging problems in oil and gas fields development. When dealing with complex reservoir geology and high reservoir heterogeneities, stochastic optimization methods are the most suitable approaches for optimal well placement. However, these methods require in general a considerable computational effort (in terms of number of reservoir simulations, which are CPU time demanding). This paper presents the use of the CMA-ES (Covariance Matrix Adaptation - Evolution Strategy) optimizer, which is recognized as one of the most powerful derivative free optimizers, to optimize well locations and trajectories. A local regression based meta-model is incorporated into the optimization process in order to reduce the computational cost. The objective function (e.g., the NPV) can usually be split into local components referring to each of the wells: it depends in general on a smaller number of principal parameters, and thus can be modeled as a partially separable function. In this paper, we propose to exploit the partial separability of the objective function into CMA-ES coupled with meta-models, by building partially separated meta-models. Thus, different meta-models are built for each well or set of wells, which results in a more accurate modeling. An example is presented. Results show that taking advantage of the partial separability of the objective function leads to a significant decrease in the number of reservoir simulations needed to find the "optimal" well configuration, given a restricted budget of reservoir simulations. This approach is practical and promising when dealing with a large number of wells to be located.

[1]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Local Meta-models for Optimization Using Evolution Strategies , 2006, PPSN.

[2]  Guillermo Montes,et al.  The Use of Genetic Algorithms in Well Placement Optimization , 2001 .

[3]  Yu Ding.  Optimization of Well Placement Using Evolutionary Methods , 2008 .

[4]  Fahim Forouzanfar.  Well-placement optimization , 2012 .

[5]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Optimization of Nonconventional Well Type, Location, and Trajectory , 2003 .

[6]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  Adjoint-Based Well Trajectory Optimization , 2009 .

[7]  Khalid Aziz,et al.  Optimization of Multilateral Well Design and Location in a Real Field Using a Continuous Genetic Algorithm , 2010 .

[8]  Paris Sud,et al.  Well placement optimization , 2012 .

[9]  Anne Auger,et al.  Using Evolution Strategy with Meta-models for Well Placement Optimization , 2010, ArXiv.

[10]  Wen H. Chen,et al.  Efficient Well Placement Optimization with Gradient-based Algorithms and Adjoint Models , 2008 .

[11]  Adrian Morales.  A Modified Genetic Algorithm Applied to Horizontal Well Placement Optimization in Gas Condensate Reservoirs , 2010 .

[12]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Evaluating the CMA Evolution Strategy on Multimodal Test Functions , 2004, PPSN.

[13]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  A Two-Stage Well Placement Optimization Method Based on Adjoint Gradient , 2010 .

[14]  Dilza Szwarcman,et al.  Well Placement Optimization Using a Genetic Algorithm With Nonlinear Constraints , 2009 .

[15]  Gijs van Essen,et al.  Adjoint-Based Well-Placement Optimization Under Production Constraints , 2008 .

[16]  Thomas Philip Runarsson,et al.  Constrained Evolutionary Optimization by Approximate Ranking and Surrogate Models , 2004, PPSN.

[17]  Roland N. Horne,et al.  Optimization of Well Placement , 2000 .