Use of Decorative Concrete Overlay for Transportation Infrastructure Design

The novel concept of applying decorative concrete overlay (DCO) during the infrastructure design process supports the nationwide initiative for increased implementation of context-sensitive solutions. The DCO is a polymer-acrylic cementitious microtopping, a few millimeters thick, colored to look like stone, brick, or wood, for example, and skimmed or sprayed onto existing or new structural concrete. This research aimed to evaluate the potential of DCO to serve as a long-lasting aesthetic treatment for transportation infrastructure. A brief case study of typical decorative treatments and their associated costs indicated that DCO would be competitive in certain infrastructure applications. The DCO durability characteristics were examined by incorporating environmental conditions such as submersion in saltwater, exposure to ultraviolet light and moisture cycling, and intrusion of deicing salts (salt ponding). Fracture and pull-off adhesion testing were also conducted to evaluate the bonding of DCO to structural concrete. Flexural fracture testing showed that the bond between the DCO and concrete sample was unbroken, and failure was observed in the structural concrete. Adhesion testing indicated that the spray-on application method produces significantly stronger bond strengths than the alternative sponge technique. However, DCO must be sprayed on within a specific thickness range in order to achieve optimum strength. Chloride-ponding test results indicated that an additional benefit of DCO is that it acts as a protective coating against salt penetration. Overall, the research indicated that there may be significant potential for implementing DCO as a lasting and durable decorative contribution to the transportation design process.

[1]  Thomas Ralston.  Bringing the Seashore Inside with Decorative Concrete , 2002 .

[2]  Marsha Mason.  CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS , 2002 .

[3]  V. Sirivivatnanon,et al.  FIELD INDICATOR OF CHLORIDE PENETRATION DEPTH , 2003 .

[4]  W. H. B. Court,et al.  The Workshop of the World. , 1962 .

[5]  Lance A. Boyer.  DECORATIVE CONCRETE HAS COME A LONG WAY , 2002 .

[6]  J. Christopher Ball,et al.  DESIGNING WITH COLORED ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE , 2002 .

[7]  T R Neuman,et al.  A guide to best practices for achieving context sensitive solutions , 2002 .

[8]  Bob Harris.  Decorative Concreting - Where It’s Been and Going! , 2004 .

[9]  Joe Nasvik.  Pioneering Efforts in Decorative Concrete Flatwork , 2004 .

[10]  Andres Bernal,et al.  PARADIGMS IN CONCRETE DESIGN AND AESTHETICS , 2004 .

[11]  Daniel Frentress.  COLORED CONCRETE ENHANCES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR , 2002 .

[12]  S. Yu. Sharivker,et al.  Investigation of the adhesion strength of coatings applied by detonation-gun flame sparying , 1972 .

[13]  Chantale Doucet,et al.  TECHNICAL INFORMATION DATA SHEETS , 2012 .

[14]  Katrien Audenaert,et al.  Effect of hydroxyl ions on chloride penetration depth measurement using the colorimetric method , 2008 .

[15]  Mark West.  Fabric-Formed Concrete Columns , 2004 .

[16]  Luc Courard,et al.  Effect of concrete surface treatment on adhesion in repair systems , 2005 .

[17]  Greg Lamm.  Looking to add beauty? What about decorative overlay systems? , 2002 .

[18]  C. C. Yang,et al.  Relation between the diffusion characteristic of concrete from salt ponding test and accelerated chloride migration test , 2007 .

[19]  Zhanjun Zhang,et al.  Measurements with a New Peel Adhesion Test on Waterproof Membranes Used on Concrete Bridge Decks , 2008 .

[20]  Randy Rodgers.  Successful Colored Flatwork , 2004 .

[21]  Paul Monesi.  BRINGING BACK D.C.'S MAJESTIC TAFT BRIDGE LIONS , 2002 .