Design optimization for a 2-D sparse transducer array for 3-D ultrasound imaging

In 3-D ultrasound imaging where 2-D transducer arrays with more than hundreds of elements are used, sparse arrays can be used to reduce the number of active ultrasound channels. Under a restriction of desired number of active channels, we can maximize the image quality by optimally choosing the positions of active elements. Here we use the method of simulated annealing to find the optimal configuration of a 2-D sparse array. This algorithm tries to minimize the value of an objective function defined as the energy ratio between the non-focal and focal regions in the point spread function (PSF). Optimal configurations were found for the cases of choosing 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32 transmit and receive elements from a 16×16-element rectangular transducer array. With only 32 transmit and 32 receive elements, we could achieve an energy ratio of 16%, compared to 6% of the full array, which is the gold standard utilizing all the 256 elements for both transmit and receive. Using Field II, we simulated imaging with the optimal sparse arrays, for off-axis targets as well as on-axis targets, and the resulting images were compared with those from some other configurations, such as full-transmit full-receive, full-transmit x-receive, x-transmit boundary-receive, and so on.

[1]  D.H. Turnbull,et al.  Beam steering with pulsed two-dimensional transducer arrays , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  S. Holm,et al.  Properties of the beampattern of weight- and layout-optimized sparse arrays , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[4]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Weight- and Layout-Optimized Sparse Arrays , 1997 .

[5]  A. Austeng,et al.  Sparse 2-D arrays for 3-D phased array imaging - design methods , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Simulation of B-Scan Images from Two-Dimensional Transducer Arrays: Part I - Methods and Quantitative Contrast Measurements , 1992 .

[7]  Sverre Holm,et al.  1D and 2D algorithmically optimized sparse arrays , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[8]  J. Arendt.  Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[9]  R. E. Davidsen,et al.  Two-Dimensional Random Arrays for Real Time Volumetric Imaging , 1994, Ultrasonic imaging.

[10]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Sparse Sampling in Array Processing , 2001 .

[11]  A. Trucco,et al.  A stochastic approach to optimizing the aperture and the number of elements of an aperiodic array , 1996, OCEANS 96 MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings. The Coastal Ocean - Prospects for the 21st Century.

[12]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  Jørgen A Jensen,et al.  Space-time encoding for high frame rate ultrasound imaging. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[14]  Vittorio Murino,et al.  Synthesis of unequally spaced arrays by simulated annealing , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  Sverre Holm,et al.  1D- and 2D-Sparse-Array-Optimization , 1999 .

[16]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Sparse array imaging with spatially-encoded transmits , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[17]  Vera Behar,et al.  ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF SYNTHETIC APERTURE ULTRASOUND IMAGING USING THE EFFECTIVE APERTURE APPROACH , 2006 .

[18]  A. Trucco,et al.  Thinning and weighting of large planar arrays by simulated annealing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  Butrus T. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Minimally Redundant 2-D Array Designs for 3-D Medical Ultrasound Imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Schlumberger Geco-Prakla.  OPTIMIZATION OF SPARSE ARRAYS BY AN IMPROVED SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM Jon-Fredrik Hopperstad , 1999 .

[21]  O. Oralkan,et al.  Volumetric ultrasound imaging using 2-D CMUT arrays , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[24]  P. K. Weber.  1 Dand 2 D-Sparse-Array-Optimization , .

[25]  Eberhard Brunner,et al.  How Ultrasound System Considerations Influence Front-End Component Choice , 2002 .

[26]  R. E. Davidsen,et al.  Two-Dimensional Random Arrays for Real Time Volumetric Imaging , 1994 .

[27]  O. Oralkan,et al.  An endoscopic imaging system based on a two-dimensional CMUT array: real-time imaging results , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[28]  R. M. Schmitt,et al.  Optimization of random sparse 2-D transducer arrays for 3-D electronic beam steering and focusing , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[29]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Optimizing the radiation pattern of sparse periodic linear arrays , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  F.S. Foster,et al.  Optimizing the radiation pattern of sparse periodic two-dimensional arrays , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.