Leveraging the electronic medical record to implement an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program.

OBJECTIVE Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) reduces aneurysm-related mortality and has been recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and American Heart Association since 2005. Medicare has covered a one-time screening ultrasound for new male enrollees with a familial or smoking history since 2007. Nevertheless, in the U.S., screening has remained underutilized. Review of patients with ruptured AAA in our system in 2007 showed the majority were undiagnosed, yet met U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and American Heart Association screening guidelines. To reduce the number of preventable AAA ruptures and deaths in our patients, we implemented an AAA screening program using our electronic medical record (EMR). This study describes the design, implementation, and early results of that screening program. METHODS Between March 2012 and June 2013, men aged 65 to 75 years with any history of smoking were targeted for screening. Medical records were reviewed electronically to exclude patients with abdominal imaging studies within 10 years that would have diagnosed an AAA. Best practice alerts (BPA) were created in the EMR so when an appropriate patient is seen, office staff and providers are prompted to order an aortic ultrasound. AAA was defined as aortic diameter ≥3.0 cm or greater, and ultrasound reports contained a standard template providing guidance for patient management when an aneurysm was identified. Newly identified AAAs were triaged for vascular surgery consultation or follow-up with their primary physician. The number of eligible patients, unscreened patients, and AAAs identified were tabulated by our Regional Outpatient Safety Net Program. RESULTS In a population of 3.6 million, 55,610 patients initially met screening criteria, and 26,837 (48.26%) were excluded from the BPA because of prior abdominal imaging studies. After 15 months, there were 68,164 patients who met screening criteria, 54,356 (79.74%) of whom had undergone an abdominal imaging study. Thus, 27,519 patients underwent an imaging study after the BPA was activated. During the study period, 731 new AAAs were diagnosed, 165 over 4.0 cm in diameter. Screening rates have increased at all medical centers where the BPA was activated, and the percentage of unscreened patients has been reduced from 51.74% to 20.26% system-wide. CONCLUSIONS In an integrated health care system using an EMR, AAA screening can be implemented with a dramatic reduction in unscreened patients. Further analysis is required to assess the impact of the screening program on AAA rupture rate and cost-effectiveness in our system.

[1]  R D Sayers,et al.  A multicentre observational study of the outcomes of screening detected sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[2]  M. Kanter,et al.  Proactive office encounter: a systematic approach to preventive and chronic care at every patient encounter. , 2010, The Permanente journal.

[3]  L. Baker,et al.  Late diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms substantiates underutilization of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening for Medicare beneficiaries. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  H A Ashton,et al.  Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5‐year results of a randomized controlled study , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  E. Shaw,et al.  Twenty-year review of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men in the county of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  J. Earnshaw,et al.  Implementation of the National Health Service Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program in England. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  J. Lindholt,et al.  Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from a randomised population screening trial. , 2002, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[8]  G. Moneta Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study , 2010 .

[9]  B. Lal,et al.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm with electronic clinical reminders. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[10]  Jiaquan Xu,et al.  Deaths: final data for 2010. , 2013, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[11]  Konrad Jamrozik,et al.  Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Rodney A. White,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Associations for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervent , 2006, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[13]  Evelyn P Whitlock,et al.  Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Best-Evidence Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Jim Bellows,et al.  Preventing myocardial infarction and stroke with a simplified bundle of cardioprotective medications. , 2009, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  RAP Scott,et al.  The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Collin,et al.  Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5‐year results of a randomized controlled study , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  M J Buxton,et al.  Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  P. Cram,et al.  Failure to Recognize Newly Identified Aortic Dilations in a Health Care System With an Advanced Electronic Medical Record , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Thomas S Riles,et al.  Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  Eugene S. Lee,et al.  Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen For Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  Rodney A. White,et al.  ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography , 2006, Circulation.

[22]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Systematic review of guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  B. Gersh,et al.  Population Trends in the Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2011 .

[24]  Eugene S. Lee,et al.  Outcomes of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.