Battery electric vehicles: Looking behind to move forward

It is getting increasingly crucial for policymakers to acquire reliable price forecasts for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) to make choices and set priorities. Here, we examine the prospects for the wide deployment of BEVs, following an ex-post analysis of their learning rate and an ex-ante forecast of their price up to 2040. We make a clear distinction between the mainstream of BEVs and a hypothetical group of BEVs that are technically on a par with internal combustion vehicles (ICVs). To do so, we introduce a new index, in which the driving range and max-speed of a vehicle are coupled together, i.e., the Mobility-Diffusion coefficient. We highlight different shares of battery packs (i.e., 19 ± 1%), and the ensemble of electrification components (e.g., battery pack, electric motor, power electronics), i.e., electrification cost (52 ± 2%), in the price of a BEV. Our price projections suggest that there is no prospect of breakeven between BEVs and ICVs before 2040 for both groups of BEVs, because the current learning rates of 9 ± 2% and 15 ± 1% for the price and electrification costs, respectively, of BEVs. Strong and long-term support from policymakers is required to ensure competitiveness of BEVs with ICVs in the near future.

[1]  Jy-Shing Wu,et al.  Affordability of electric vehicles for a sustainable transport system: An economic and environmental analysis , 2013 .

[2]  G. Blomgren The development and future of lithium ion batteries , 2017 .

[3]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[4]  Thomas Franke,et al.  What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users , 2013 .

[5]  Doron Aurbach,et al.  Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities , 2016 .

[6]  Claus Daniel,et al.  Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries , 2015 .

[7]  Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan,et al.  Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway , 2016 .

[8]  Andrew Harrison,et al.  A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles , 2012 .

[9]  Linda F. Nazar,et al.  Lithium-sulfur batteries , 2014 .

[10]  Jean-Marie Tarascon,et al.  Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. , 2011, Nature materials.

[11]  M. Whittingham,et al.  Electrical Energy Storage and Intercalation Chemistry , 1976, Science.

[12]  Claire Villevieille,et al.  Rechargeable Batteries: Grasping for the Limits of Chemistry , 2015 .

[13]  M. Armand,et al.  Building better batteries , 2008, Nature.

[14]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  On the electrification of road transportation – A review of the environmental, economic, and social performance of electric two-wheelers , 2015, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[15]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  Going Electric: Expert Survey on the Future of Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[17]  Guy Marlair,et al.  In-depth safety-focused analysis of solvents used in electrolytes for large scale lithium ion batteries. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[18]  E. Williams,et al.  Learning dependent subsidies for lithium-ion electric vehicle batteries , 2015 .

[19]  Jay F. Whitacre,et al.  Comparison between cylindrical and prismatic lithium-ion cell costs using a process based cost model , 2017 .

[20]  André Faaij,et al.  Performance of batteries for electric vehicles on short and longer term , 2012 .

[21]  Patrícia Fortes,et al.  Assessing the cost-effectiveness of electric vehicles in European countries using integrated modeling , 2015 .

[22]  Mohammadhosein Safari,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Aging of Li-Ion Batteries , 2016 .

[23]  M. Safari,et al.  Multimodal Physics-Based Aging Model for Life Prediction of Li-Ion Batteries , 2009 .

[24]  Geng Wu,et al.  Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles: A probabilistic analysis and projection across market segments , 2015 .

[25]  Srikkanth Ramachandran,et al.  Well to wheel analysis of low carbon alternatives for road traffic , 2015 .

[26]  P. Wells,et al.  Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles , 2013 .

[27]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  A review of experience curve analyses for energy demand technologies , 2010 .

[28]  B. Dunn,et al.  Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices , 2011, Science.

[29]  John B Goodenough,et al.  The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  S. Hultén,et al.  Escaping lock-in: The case of the electric vehicle☆ , 1996 .

[31]  David Banister,et al.  Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution , 2012 .

[32]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  On the electrification of road transport - Learning rates and price forecasts for hybrid-electric and battery-electric vehicles , 2012 .

[33]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  An analysis of the retail and lifecycle cost of battery-powered electric vehicles , 2001 .

[34]  Peter Lamp,et al.  Future generations of cathode materials: an automotive industry perspective , 2015 .

[35]  B. Nykvist,et al.  Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles , 2015 .

[36]  Christopher M Wolverton,et al.  Electrical energy storage for transportation—approaching the limits of, and going beyond, lithium-ion batteries , 2012 .

[37]  Jasim Ahmed,et al.  Algorithms for Advanced Battery-Management Systems , 2010, IEEE Control Systems.

[38]  Gregory J. Offer,et al.  Automated vehicles and electrification of transport , 2015 .

[39]  J. Tarascon,et al.  Sustainability and in situ monitoring in battery development. , 2016, Nature materials.