A simulation model of foraging behaviour and the effect of predation risk

Summary 1. The effect of predation risk on the distribution of animals foraging in a patchy environment was explored using a simulation model based on the work of Bernstein, Kacelnik & Krebs (1988, 1991), extended to incorporate predation risk. 2. Modelled foragers consume prey within patches, having different prey densities, at a rate that depends only on prey density and interference from other foragers in the patch. Prey density remains constant (no depletion). A forager leaves a patch if its intake rate drops below its estimate of the average intake rate available in the environment. This estimate is continually updated by taking a weighted average of current intake and the previous estimate, giving a simple learning process. Decisions on whether to leave are made at regular intervals and a forager leaving a patch may arrive at random at any other patch. 3. Simulation results were sensitive to the computational scheme used to represent estimates of average intake rate in the environment and to the way in which foragers’ decisions were distributed over time, illustrating the need for careful formulation of such models. 4. Predation risk was modelled as a cost that reduced effective intake, and could be distributed uniformly or skewed to patches of high prey density. The effects of different levels and distributions of predation risk on distribution of foragers were examined using model parameters broadly appropriate to hedgehogs (Erinaceous europaeus L.) foraging for earthworms (Lumbricus spp.) and risking opportunistic predation by badgers (Meles meles L.). The distribution of foragers with respect to prey density took an ‘ideal free’ form for zero or uniform risk, and was domed when cost of predation risk was relatively high and concentrated in the richer patches, as might be the case when predators and foragers share a common food resource.

[1]  C. S. Holling Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[2]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[3]  M. Hassell,et al.  New Inductive Population Model for Insect Parasites and its Bearing on Biological Control , 1969, Nature.

[4]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  J. McNamara Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment , 1982 .

[6]  Alan J. Steiner Comtrap: A Trapping Simulation Interactive Computer Program , 1983 .

[7]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distribution , 1983 .

[8]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Foraging-efficiency-predation-risk trade-off in the grey squirrel , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[10]  A I Houston,et al.  Memory and the efficient use of information. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  J. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT , 1988 .

[12]  Jacqueline F. Savino,et al.  Behavioural interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant density , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  J E Staddon,et al.  Stochastic choice models: A comparison between Bush-Mosteller and a source-independent reward-following model. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  L. Dill,et al.  A DETERMINATION OF THE ENERGETIC EQUIVALENCE OF THE RISK OF PREDATION , 1989 .

[15]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[16]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  The role of shifting in choice behavior of pigeons on a two-armed bandit , 1990, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  John R. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. II. THE INFLUENCE OF TRAVEL COSTS AND STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENT , 1991 .

[18]  J. Newman Patch Use under Predation Hazard: Foraging behavior in a Simple Stochastic Environment , 1991 .

[19]  G. Parker,et al.  Competition for resources , 1991 .

[20]  J. Krebs,et al.  Learning and Foraging: Individuals, Groups, and Populations , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. M. Baveco,et al.  An object-oriented tool for individual-oriented simulation : host-parasitoid system application , 1992 .

[22]  C Bernstein,et al.  The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR FOOD PATCHES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTIONS IN STICKLEBACKS' , 1993 .

[24]  Clive W. Anderson,et al.  Predicting the Distribution of Individuals and the Consequences of Habitat Loss: The Role of Prey Depletion , 1993 .

[25]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural responses to food addition by hedgehogs , 1994 .

[26]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Factors regulating local variations in abundance: field tests on hedgehogs, Erinaceus europaeus , 1994 .

[27]  T. Tregenza Common misconceptions in applying the ideal free distribution , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  P. Dolman,et al.  Combining behaviour and population dynamics with applications for predicting consequences of habitat loss , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  M. Milinski Ideal free theory predicts more than only input matching - a critique of Kennedy and Gray's review , 1994 .

[30]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Ideal Free Distributions of Stream Fish: A Model and Test with Minnows, Rhinicthys Atratulus , 1995 .

[31]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. I: Empirical game theory distribution model of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis , 1995 .

[32]  R. Gray,et al.  Patch choice with competitive asymmetries and perceptual limits: the importance of history , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  C. M. Lessells Putting resource dynamics into continuous input ideal free distribution models , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  A. Houston,et al.  The distribution of animals between resources: a compromise between equal numbers and equal intake rates , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  William W. Hargrove,et al.  Predicting spatial distribution of foragers over large resource landscapes : a modeling analysis of the Ideal Free Distribution , 1997 .

[36]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Responses of foraging hedgehogs to badger odour , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Keith D. Farnsworth,et al.  Animal foraging from an individual perspective: an object orientated model , 1998 .