Ground adaptive standing controller for a powered transfemoral prosthesis

The scope of this work is the design and verification of a new standing controller for a powered knee and ankle prosthesis. The controller is based upon a finite-state impedance control approach previously developed by the authors. The controller provides a comprehensive standing behavior that incorporates ground adaptation for unlevel terrain. An amputee subject tested the controller with a powered prosthesis for a variety of standing conditions. Results indicate that the powered prosthesis can estimate the ground slope within ±1 degree over a range of ±15 degrees, and that it can provide appropriate joint impedances for standing on slopes within this range.

[1]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Powered sit-to-stand and assistive stand-to-sit framework for a powered transfemoral prosthesis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  P. Rougier,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Postural Control of Persons with Transtibial or Transfemoral Amputation , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[3]  B. Heller,et al.  A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[4]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Volitional Control of a Prosthetic Knee Using Surface Electromyography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  S.K. Au,et al.  Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis for the Improvement of Amputee Ambulation , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  N. Ordway,et al.  Comparison Between the C-leg® Microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee and Non-Microprocessor Control Prosthetic Knees: A Preliminary Study of Energy Expenditure, Obstacle Course Performance, and Quality of Life Survey , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  J. Weber,et al.  Design of an agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[12]  Mark Speechley,et al.  Balance confidence among people with lower-limb amputations. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[13]  Malte Bellmann,et al.  Comparative biomechanical analysis of current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered Ankle--Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Preliminary Evaluations of a Self-Contained Anthropomorphic Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  S. Bennett,et al.  Postural Sway and Active Balance Performance in Highly Active Lower-Limb Amputees , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Evaluation of Function, Performance, and Preference as Transfemoral Amputees Transition From Mechanical to Microprocessor Control of the Prosthetic Knee , 2008 .

[18]  Seishi Sawamura,et al.  Effect of an Intelligent Prosthesis (IP) on the Walking Ability of Young Transfemoral Amputees: Comparison of IP Users with Able-Bodied People , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[19]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Thomas Schmalz,et al.  The Safety of C-Leg: Biomechanical Tests , 2009 .

[21]  A. Hof,et al.  Balance control on a moving platform in unilateral lower limb amputees. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[22]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  Prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism capable of automatic adaptation to the walking surface. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  J. Paysant,et al.  Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits , 2008, Neural Networks.

[25]  D. Smith,et al.  Foot loading in amputee stance , 1984, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[26]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  An Active Foot-Ankle Prosthesis With Biomechanical Energy Regeneration , 2010 .

[27]  A E Patla,et al.  Ankle muscle stiffness in the control of balance during quiet standing. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Denny J. Padgett,et al.  Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[29]  L. E. Powell,et al.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[30]  W. Miller,et al.  The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Michael S Orendurff,et al.  Gait efficiency using the C-Leg. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  U. Holmberg,et al.  Foot and ground measurement using portable sensors , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[33]  T.G. Sugar,et al.  SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.