Access Enhancement by Making Changes in the Route Network to Facilitate Rescue perations in Urban Disasters

Having access to locations struck by natural environmental disasters is one of the chief necessities in urban disaster management. This paper aims to study different physical and semi-physical patterns for increasing access to different districts in a city through applying changes to the present network of routes. To attain this goal, District 6 of Tehran Municipality was selected for the case study. The technique used in this research is based on multi-criteria decision- making methods. Thus, the patterns and indices were extracted by means of AHP method, and then the indices were assigned weights. These patterns were, then, analyzed and ranked through TOPSIS, FUZZY and SAW techniques respectively. Next, the results were combined by means of Borda method. The results indicated that A 4 pattern which obtained 7 maximum scores was the most efficient pattern in increasing access through changes in the network of routes. Next to it is A 3 pattern which ranked second. It is, therefore, suggested that in order to increase access for rescue operation in urban disasters, parallel routes in directions of the first and second priority, east to west and north to south, must be constructed so that arterial roads in the district offer better services in normal and emergency conditions.

[1]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  A Contextual Model of Natural Hazard , 1989 .

[2]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in modular product design , 2001, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[3]  B. Davis.  TRANSPORT-RELATED IMPACTS OF THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE , 1998 .

[4]  Pourahmad Ahmad,et al.  The Impact of Urban Sprawl up on Air Pollution , 2007 .

[5]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[6]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Probabilistic Earthquake Scenarios: Extending Risk Analysis Methodologies to Spatially Distributed Systems , 2000 .

[7]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[8]  A R Karbasi,et al.  Energy Saving in Tehran International Flower Exhibition's Building , 2008 .

[9]  John R. Weeks,et al.  Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  H. Moulin.  Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making , 1988 .

[11]  James E. Moore,et al.  Loss Estimation Due to Seismic Risks to Highway Systems , 1997 .

[12]  P. Williams.  Crisis Management , 1972, Contemporary Strategy.

[13]  Geoffrey I. Crouch,et al.  Application of the analytic hierarchy process to tourism choice and decision making : a review and illustration applied to destination competitiveness. , 2005 .

[14]  Chao Fu,et al.  Extended TOPSISs for Belief Group Decision Making , 2008 .

[15]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective , 2001 .

[16]  Burton Al.  The environment as hazard , 1978 .

[17]  F. Pergalani,et al.  An attempt to link risk assessment with land use planning: a recent experience in Italy , 1996 .

[18]  S Menoni.  Chains of damages and failures in a metropolitan environment: some observations on the Kobe earthquake in 1995. , 2001, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  S. Cutter.  Vulnerability to environmental hazards , 1996 .

[20]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Linking Infrastructure and Urban Economy: Simulation of Water-Disruption Impacts in Earthquakes , 2002 .