Improvement of three-dimensional motion sickness using a virtual reality simulator for robot-assisted surgery in undergraduate medical students: A prospective observational study

Background A virtual reality (VR) simulator is utilized as an inexpensive tool for gaining basic technical competence in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). We evaluated operator 3D motion sickness while using a VR simulator and assessed whether it can be reduced by repeating the training. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University, a tertiary level training hospital in an urban setting. A total of 30 undergraduate medical students participated in the study. We compared whether the VR simulator improved the students’ skills in operating the da Vinci robot. Fifteen students underwent training with a VR simulator for 4 hours a day for 5 days. Then, motion sickness was ascertained using the Visual Analog Scale and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) before and after the training. Results Manipulation time significantly improved after training compared to before training (293.9 ± 72.4 versus 143.6 ± 18.4 seconds, p < 0.001). Although motion sickness worsened after each training session, continuous practice with the VR simulator gradually reduced this. SSQ subscores showed that the VR simulator elicited nausea, disorientation, and oculomotor strain, and oculomotor strain was significantly improved with repeated training. Conclusion In undergraduate students, practice with the VR simulator improved the technique of RAS and operator 3D motion sickness caused by 3D manipulation of the da Vinci robot.

[1]  Weimin Huang,et al.  Can Robots Accelerate the Learning Curve for Surgical Training? An Analysis of Residents and Medical Students. , 2018, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[2]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Distribution of innate psychomotor skills recognized as important for surgical specialization in unconditioned medical undergraduates , 2018, Surgical endoscopy.

[3]  Alyssa Tanaka,et al.  Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  A. Darzi,et al.  The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  Prokar Dasgupta,et al.  Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts , 2015, BJU international.

[6]  C. Lallas,et al.  Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. , 2012, Urology.

[7]  T. L. Ghezzi,et al.  30 Years of Robotic Surgery , 2016, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  Jon C. Gould,et al.  Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  Chandru P Sundaram,et al.  Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods , 2013, BJU international.

[10]  R D Gilson,et al.  Ataxia following exposure to a virtual environment. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[11]  L. Weichenthal,et al.  Motion Sickness: Comparison of Metoclopramide and Diphenhydramine to Placebo , 2011, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[12]  Brian Miles,et al.  Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  David M Studdert,et al.  Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. , 2003, Surgery.

[14]  Paweł Strojny,et al.  Can Simulator Sickness Be Avoided? A Review on Temporal Aspects of Simulator Sickness , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[15]  Rs Kennedy,et al.  A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) : A new method for quantifying simulator sickness , 1993 .

[16]  Li-li Zhang,et al.  Motion Sickness: Current Knowledge and Recent Advance , 2016, CNS neuroscience & therapeutics.

[17]  R. Reddy,et al.  Should every medical student receive exposure to robotic surgery? , 2017, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[18]  E. MacCraith,et al.  Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges , 2019, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[19]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery. , 2016, European urology.

[20]  J. Anger,et al.  Robotic urologic surgery: trends in litigation over the last decade , 2019, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[21]  Myriam J. Curet,et al.  Introduction to the Robotic System , 2014 .