Combined heat and power in Dutch greenhouses: A case study of technology diffusion

This paper presents a case study of the rapid diffusion of combined heat and power (CHP) units through the Dutch greenhouse horticulture sector between 2003 and 2009 in order to gain new insights regarding technology transitions. We present a sectoral diffusion analysis framework, which we apply to identify and examine developments in technical, economic, institutional, cultural and ecological domains that all contributed to an emergent and thorough CHP diffusion in the Dutch greenhouse sector. Five identified key drivers behind the CHP diffusion are the opening of the energy market in 2002, the high spark spread during the transition period, the compatibility of output of a CHP unit with greenhouse demand, the flexibility provided by heat buffers, and the cooperative and competitive greenhouse sector culture. We conclude that policies to stimulate or steer technology diffusion will benefit from an in-depth analysis of domain interactions and company decision-making processes. Such an in-depth analysis makes for well informed and targeted policies that are better able to steer an industrial sector effectively and in a socially desired direction.

[1]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[2]  Igor Nikolic,et al.  Universal Darwinism in greenhouses: Proof of concept using an agent based model , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control.

[3]  Emmanuel G. Koukios,et al.  Solar systems diffusion in local markets , 2004 .

[4]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the rapid diffusion of Dutch cogeneration by innovation system functioning , 2007 .

[5]  R. Kemp,et al.  The diffusion of clean technologies: A review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis , 2008 .

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[7]  Igor Nikolic,et al.  Evolving Greenhouses: An Agent-Based Model of Universal Darwinism in Greenhouse Horticulture , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[8]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Diffusion of energy-saving innovations in industry and the built environment: Dutch studies as inputs for a more integrated analytical framework , 2004 .

[9]  P. X. Smit,et al.  Energiemonitor van de Nederlandse glastuinbouw 2009 , 2008 .

[10]  Evgenia Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources , 2015 .

[11]  Barbara Wejnert.  Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a Conceptual Framework. , 2002 .

[12]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions , 1994 .

[13]  N. Schrauwen,et al.  Innovativeness of Innovation: A study on the effects of social institutions on innovation practices in the Westland horticulture sector , 2012 .

[14]  C. Montalvo.  General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: a survey 1990–2007 , 2008 .

[15]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[16]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Innovation and adoption of energy efficient technologies: An exploratory analysis of Italian primary metal manufacturing SMEs , 2013 .

[17]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy , 2005 .