An exergy analysis of tubular solar-thermal receivers with different working fluids

Tubular solar thermal receivers suitable for central towers are modelled using energy and exergy analysis, in a way that allows individual inspection of the the irreversibilities associated with the various receiver heat transfer processes occurring. The model was used to compare the behaviour of four working fluids: molten salt (NaNO3/KNO3), liquid sodium metal, supercritical carbon dioxide, and ideal air. In the working fluid temperature range 300–550 °C, the model showed sodium and molten salt to be the best performers. At elevated temperature ranges, sodium and carbon dioxide become the preferred candidates. The biggest differences in exergy terms between the alternative fluids are in exergy loss by thermal emission, and in the exergy destruction associated with internal convection losses and wall conduction.

[1]  A. R. Mahoney,et al.  Characterization of Pyromark 2500 Paint for High-Temperature Solar Receivers , 2014 .

[2]  L. I. Stiel,et al.  Viscosity of Gaseous Air at Moderate and High Pressures. , 1966 .

[3]  W. Wakeham,et al.  The Transport Properties of Carbon Dioxide , 1990 .

[4]  M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez,et al.  Thermal design guidelines of solar power towers , 2014 .

[5]  L. Leibowitz,et al.  Thermodynamic and transport properties of sodium liquid and vapor , 1995 .

[6]  T. Schulenberg,et al.  Heat transfer at supercritical pressures. Literature review and application to an HPLWR , 2001 .

[7]  Joshua M. Christian,et al.  Effects of RANS-Type turbulence models on the convective heat loss computed by CFD in the solar two power tower , 2014 .

[8]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Assessment of Solar Power Tower Driven Ultrasupercritical Steam Cycles Applying Tubular Central Receivers With Varied Heat Transfer Media , 2010 .

[9]  Akira Nagashima,et al.  Viscosity and thermal conductivity of dry air in the gaseous phase , 1985 .

[10]  Robert A. Taylor,et al.  Liquid sodium versus Hitec as a heat transfer fluid in solar thermal central receiver systems , 2012 .

[11]  Ralf Uhlig,et al.  Thermodynamic evaluation of liquid metals as heat transfer fluids in concentrated solar power plants Original Research Article , 2013 .

[12]  Alexis B. Zavoico,et al.  Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0 , 2001 .

[13]  María José Montes,et al.  Thermofluidynamic Model and Comparative Analysis of Parabolic Trough Collectors Using Oil, Water/Steam, or Molten Salt as Heat Transfer Fluids , 2010 .

[14]  W. Wagner,et al.  A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple‐Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa , 1996 .

[15]  John Pye,et al.  A new 500m2 paraboloidal dish solar concentrator , 2011 .

[16]  A. Abdel-azim.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 2011 .

[17]  M. McLinden,et al.  NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0 , 2007 .

[18]  Yves Candau,et al.  On the exergy of radiation , 2003 .

[19]  Brian D. Iverson,et al.  Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power , 2014 .

[20]  Robert A. Taylor,et al.  High temperature solar thermal central-receiver billboard design , 2013 .

[21]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[22]  W. Wakeham,et al.  The Viscosity of Carbon Dioxide , 1998 .