Selection-Integrated Optimization (SIO) Methodology for Optimal Design of Adaptive Systems

Many engineering systems are required to operate under changing operating conditions. A special class of systems called adaptive systems have been proposed in the literature to achieve high performance under changing environments. Adaptive systems acquire this powerful feature by allowing their design configuration to change with operating conditions. In the optimization of the adaptive systems, designers are often required to select (i) adaptive and (ii) non-adaptive (or fixed) design variables of the design configuration. Generally, the selection of these variables, and the optimization of adaptive systems are performed sequentially, thus leaving a likelihood of a sub-optimal design. In this paper, we propose the Selection-Integrated Optimization (SIO) methodology that integrates the two key processes: (1) the selection of the adaptive and fixed design variables, and (2) the optimization of the adaptive system, thereby leading to an optimum design. A major challenge to integrating these two key processes is the selection of the number of fixed and adaptive design variables, which is discrete in nature. We propose the Variable-Segregating Mapping-Function (VSMF) that overcomes this roadblock by progressively approximating the discreteness in the design variable selection process. This simple yet effective approach allows the SIO methodology to integrate the selection and optimization processes, and help avoid one significant source of sub-optimality from typical optimization formulations. The SIO methodology finds its applications in a variety of other engineering fields as well, such as product family optimization. However, in this paper, we limit the scope of our discussion to adaptive system optimization. The effectiveness of the SIO methodology is demonstrated by optimally designing a new air-conditioning system called Active Building Envelope (ABE) System.Copyright © 2006 by ASME

[1]  Hui Li,et al.  An Approach for Product Line Design Selection under Uncertainty and Competition , 2002 .

[2]  L. Watson,et al.  Modern homotopy methods in optimization , 1989 .

[3]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  A Method for Architecting Product Platforms , 2000 .

[4]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Platform Selection Under Performance Bounds in Optimal Design of Product Families , 2005 .

[5]  S. Azarm,et al.  Multi-objective robust optimization using a sensitivity region concept , 2005 .

[6]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Variation-Based Method for Product Family Design , 2002 .

[7]  Achille Messac,et al.  An Optimization Based Methodology to Design Flexible Systems Subjected to Changing Operating Conditions , 2005, DAC 2005.

[8]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Multidisciplinary Structural Truss Topology Optimization for Reconfigurability , 2004 .

[9]  Christoph Roser A flexible design methodology , 2000 .

[10]  T. Simpson,et al.  Conceptual design of a family of products through the use of the robust concept exploration method , 1996 .

[11]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors , 1996 .

[12]  Achille Messac,et al.  Economic Viability Assessment of Active Building Envelope Systems , 2005 .

[13]  A. Messac,et al.  The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto frontier , 2003 .

[14]  Andrew T. Olewnik A Comprehensive Decision Support Framework For Flexible System Design , 2002 .

[15]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Effective Development of Flexible Systems in Multidisciplinary Optimization , 2004 .

[16]  Jayanth N. Kudva,et al.  Morphing aircraft concepts, classifications, and challenges , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[17]  Richard J. Buist,et al.  Effect of heat sink design on thermoelectric cooling performance , 2008 .

[18]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[19]  Achille Messac,et al.  Control-Structure Integrated Design , 1992 .

[20]  A. Webb A piston revolution [internal combustion engines] , 2002 .

[21]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  On the coupling between the plant and controller optimization problems , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[22]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Valuing the flexibility of flexible manufacturing systems , 1988 .

[23]  Michael P. Martinez,et al.  Effective Product Family Design Using Physical Programming , 2002 .

[24]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  DECISION-BASED DESIGN - A CONTEMPORARY PARADIGM FOR SHIP DESIGN , 1990 .

[25]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A Framework for Flexible Systems and Its Implementation in Multiattribute Decision Making , 2004 .

[26]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization , 2003, DAC 2002.

[27]  Achille Messac,et al.  Design of thermoelectric heat pump unit for active building envelope systems , 2005 .

[28]  A. Messac,et al.  Required Relationship Between Objective Function and Pareto Frontier Orders: Practical Implications , 2001 .

[29]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Sensitivity-Based Commonality Strategy for Family Products of Mild Variation, with Application to Automotive Body Structures , 2002 .

[30]  J. A. Buzacott,et al.  Flexible manufacturing systems: a review of analytical models , 1986 .

[31]  Joycelyn S. Harrison,et al.  Aircraft Morphing program , 1998, Smart Structures.

[32]  Tony Gan Ang Photovoltaic engineering handbook , 1990 .

[33]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Commonality indices for product family design: a detailed comparison , 2006 .