The geometries of interacting arginine‐carboxyls in proteins

The geometries are reported for interacting arginine‐carboxyl pairs obtained from 37 high resolution protein structures solved to a resolution of 2.0 Å or better. The closest interatomic distance between the guanidinium and carboxyl is less than 4.2 Å for 74 arginine and carboxyl groups, with the majority of these lying within hydrogen‐bonding distance (2.6–3.0 Å). Interacting pairs have been transformed into a common orientation, and arginine‐carboxyl, and carboxyl‐arginine geometries have been calculated. This has been defined in terms of the spherical polar angles Tθ, Tϕ, and the angle P, between the guanidinium and carboxyl planes. Results show a clear preference for the guanidinium and carboxyl groups to be approximately coplanar, and for the carboxyl oxygens to hydrogen bond with the guanidinium nitrogens. Single nitrogen‐single oxygen is the most common type of interaction, however twin nitrogen‐twin oxygen interactions also occur frequently. The majority of these occur between the carboxyl oxygens and the NH1 and NE atoms of the arginine. and are only rarely observed for NH1 and NH2. The information presented may be of use in the modelling of arginine‐carboxyl interactions within proteins.

[1]  H. Umeyama,et al.  Enzymic dynamics and molecular orbital study on the roles of arginines in carboxypeptidase A, a sliding mechanism , 1978 .

[2]  J F Riordan,et al.  Arginyl residues: anion recognition sites in enzymes. , 1977, Science.

[3]  W. Lipscomb,et al.  Binding of ligands to the active site of carboxypeptidase A. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Perutz,et al.  Stereochemical basis of heat stability in bacterial ferredoxins and in haemoglobin A2 , 1975, Nature.

[5]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  The interaction between phenylalanine rings in proteins , 1985 .

[6]  M. Vijayan,et al.  Specific interactions involving guanidyl group observed in crystal structures. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[7]  J. Thornton,et al.  Ion-pairs in proteins. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. VII. Geometric parameters, partial atomic charges, nonbonded interactions, hydrogen bond interactions, and intrinsic torsional potentials for the naturally occurring amino acids , 1975 .

[9]  R. Huber,et al.  The refined 2.2-A (0.22-nm) X-ray crystal structure of the ternary complex formed by bovine trypsinogen, valine-valine and the Arg15 analogue of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1984, European journal of biochemistry.

[10]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  W. Lipscomb,et al.  Structure at 2.9-A resolution of aspartate carbamoyltransferase complexed with the bisubstrate analogue N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.