Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry.

PURPOSE The frequency-doubling (FD) phenomenon describes the increase in apparent spatial frequency occurring when low-spatial-frequency sine wave gratings undergo rapid counterphase flicker. It is unclear whether the visual mechanisms isolated when pattern appearance is used as a threshold criterion are the same as when a simple detection criterion (as in FD perimetry) is used. It is also unclear whether the FD stimulus isolates mechanisms that differ from those isolated by spatially uniform flicker. In the current study, adaptation and spatiotemporal tuning functions were determined, using the FD stimulus, uniform flicker, and static (nonflickering) grating targets, to establish whether distinct mechanisms are isolated by the FD stimulus. METHODS Spatiotemporal tuning functions were determined in six observers, using an FD stimulus under conditions of detection and resolution and using spatially uniform flickering stimuli and static grating stimuli. The effect of light adaptation on these stimulus classes was also assessed. All stimuli were 10 degrees-wide squares. RESULTS Spatiotemporal tuning functions and adaptation characteristics were identical for both the FD detection and resolution paradigms. Spatially uniform flicker gave indistinguishable tuning functions and adaptation characteristics to the FD stimulus at 25 Hz and higher, but differed below this frequency. Static grating stimuli differed from FD stimuli in both tuning functions and adaptation characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Absolute detection of the FD stimulus involves mechanisms that are indistinguishable from those involved when a criterion based on spatial form (i.e., resolution of a pattern) is used, indicating that a simple detection criterion can be used in FD perimetry. The FD stimulus isolates similar mechanisms to spatially uniform flickering stimuli at high temporal frequencies.

[1]  Andrew J Anderson,et al.  Multiple processes mediate flicker sensitivity , 2001, Vision Research.

[2]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  D. Friedman,et al.  Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Effect of decreased retinal illumination on frequency doubling technology. , 2000, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  Algis J Vingrys,et al.  Interactions between flicker thresholds and luminance pedestals , 2000, Vision Research.

[6]  M. Wall,et al.  Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  A. James,et al.  Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion , 1999, Vision Research.

[8]  R P Mills,et al.  Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  T. Maddess,et al.  Testing for glaucoma with the frequency-doubling illusion in the whole, macular and eccentric visual fields. , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  EVALUATION OF TWO SCREENING TESTS FOR FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY , 1999 .

[11]  H. Quigley Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Correlations between observability of the spatial frequency doubled illusion and a multi-region pattern electroretinogram. , 1997, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  A multiple-frequency, multiple-region pattern electroretinogram investigation of non-linear retinal signals. , 1997, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  C. Johnson,et al.  Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss? , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  C. Johnson,et al.  Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[17]  C. Johnson Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. , 1994, Journal of glaucoma.

[18]  C. Johnson,et al.  Longitudinal comparison of temporal-modulation perimetry with white-on-white and blue-on-yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  R. F. Hess,et al.  Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation , 1992, Vision Research.

[20]  Ted Maddess,et al.  Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma , 1992 .

[21]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Effects of Temporal Modulation on the Perceived Spatial Structure of Sine-Wave Gratings , 1983, Perception.

[22]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[23]  A. Watson Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location , 1982, Vision Research.

[24]  A. Parker Shifts in perceived periodicity induced by temporal modulation and their influence on the spatial frequency tuning of two aftereffects , 1981, Vision Research.

[25]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  Pattern discrimination with flickering stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[26]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[27]  C W Tyler,et al.  Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  G Nyman,et al.  Diphasic and Polyphasic Temporal Modulations Multiply Apparent Spatial Frequency , 1974, Perception.

[29]  J. Roufs Dynamic properties of vision. IV. Thresholds of decremental flashes, incremental flashes and doublets in relation to flicker fusion. , 1974, Vision research.

[30]  W Richards,et al.  Spatial frequency doubling: retinal or central? , 1973, Vision research.

[31]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  J. Roufs Dynamic properties of vision. I. Experimental relationships between flicker and flash thresholds. , 1972, Vision research.

[33]  D. H. Kelly Adaptation effects on spatio-temporal sine-wave thresholds. , 1972, Vision research.

[34]  A Pantle,et al.  Size-Detecting Mechanisms in Human Vision , 1968, Science.

[35]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  D. H. Kelly Frequency Doubling in Visual Responses , 1966 .

[37]  D. H. Kelly Visual response to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. , 1961, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[38]  H. D. L. Dzn Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex systems with intermittent and modulated light. I. Attenuation characteristics with white and colored light. , 1958 .

[39]  H DE LANGE DZN,et al.  Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex systems with intermittent and modulated light. I. Attenuation characteristics with white and colored light. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.