Early results from a United States trial of prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE To report early findings from a prospective United States clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2012 to March 2013, 72 patients were screened and 20 patients underwent treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline and selected intervals (1, 3, and 6 mo) for the following efficacy variables: American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, quality of life (QOL)-related symptoms, International Index of Erectile Function score, peak urine flow rate, and prostate volume (on magnetic resonance imaging at 6 mo). Complications were monitored and reported per Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. RESULTS Embolization was technically successful in 18 of 20 patients (90%); bilateral PAE was successful in 18 of 19 (95%). Unsuccessful embolizations were secondary to atherosclerotic occlusion of prostatic arteries. Clinical success was seen in 95% of patients (19 of 20) at 1 month, with average AUA symptom score improvements of 10.8 points at 1 month (P < .0001), 12.1 points at 3 months (P = .0003), and 9.8 points at 6 months (P = .06). QOL improved at 1 month (1.9 points; P = .0002), 3 months (1.9 points; P = .003), and 6 months (2.6 points; P = .007). Sexual function improved by 34% at 1 month (P = .11), 5% at 3 months (P = .72), and 16% at 6 months (P = .19). Prostate volume at 6 months had decreased 18% (n = 5; P = .05). No minor or major complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS Early results from this clinical trial indicate that PAE offers a safe and efficacious treatment option for men with BPH.

[1]  AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. , 2003, Journal of Urology.

[2]  J. Pisco,et al.  Prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: short- and intermediate-term results. , 2013, Radiology.

[3]  Giovanni Guido Cerri,et al.  Prostatic Artery Embolization as a Primary Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Preliminary Results in Two Patients , 2009, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[4]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. , 2009, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[5]  G. Geirsson,et al.  Transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral resection for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: a prospective randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. , 1995, British journal of urology.

[6]  J. Pisco,et al.  Does polyvinyl alcohol particle size change the outcome of prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Results from a single-center randomized prospective study. , 2014, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[7]  J. Parsons,et al.  Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Epidemiology and Risk Factors , 2010, Current bladder dysfunction reports.

[8]  T. Walker Prostatic Arterial Embolization to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia , 2011 .

[9]  J. Usón,et al.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: transcatheter arterial embolization as potential treatment--preliminary study in pigs. , 2008, Radiology.

[10]  J H Wasson,et al.  5-year outcome of surgical resection and watchful waiting for men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Pisco,et al.  Embolisation of prostatic arteries as treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign hyperplasia: results of short- and mid-term follow-up , 2013, European Radiology.

[12]  John T. Wei,et al.  Urologic diseases in America project: benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2005, The Journal of urology.